California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3280

Introduced
2/29/24  
Introduced
2/29/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/23/24  
Engrossed
5/23/24  
Refer
5/24/24  
Refer
5/24/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Chaptered
9/12/24  
Chaptered
9/12/24  
Passed
9/12/24  

Caption

Superior court: lactation rooms: Judicial Council report.

Impact

The implications of AB 3280 are significant as it mandates that superior courts ensure accessibility to lactation rooms for any court user, not just employees. The bill allows courts to designate lactation rooms that may not fully meet all the specifications required for employee lactation rooms, which aims to maximize the availability of such facilities across more courthouses. Furthermore, the Judicial Council is tasked with submitting annual reports detailing the status of compliance and funds allocation for constructing and renovating these rooms, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3280, introduced by the Committee on Judiciary, amends existing provisions regarding lactation rooms in California's court system. Under current law, courts are obligated to provide employees with access to private spaces for lactation, and this bill expands that requirement to include all court users starting from July 1, 2026. The aim is to facilitate a comfortable environment for users who need to express milk, thus promoting public health and supporting parents visiting the courts.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 3280 appears to be positive, with support for the initiative communicated in legislative discussions. Advocates for parental rights and public health, including various advocacy groups, have expressed approval for the bill. It is perceived as a progressive measure that addresses the needs of lactating individuals, thereby fostering a more inclusive judicial system. However, some concerns regarding funding and the practicality of compliance in all courthouses have been raised by skeptics.

Contention

Notably, an area of contention includes the potential for differing standards of lactation room setups, as the bill allows for designated rooms that do not fully meet employee room requirements. This could lead to variability in user experience across different courthouses. The financial implications for courts needing to implement these changes and the constraints associated with physical space may also lead to discussions in future legislative sessions regarding the sufficiency of appropriated funds.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3282

Courts.

CA AB1984

Courts.

CA SB403

Sale of county courthouses.

CA SB673

Courthouse construction: filing fee surcharges.

CA AB959

Courts.

CA AB1576

Superior court: lactation rooms.

CA AB1193

Courts: long-term lease obligations.

CA AB103

Public safety: omnibus.