California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB614

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Refer
7/27/20  
Refer
7/27/20  
Report Pass
8/6/20  
Report Pass
8/6/20  
Refer
8/10/20  

Caption

Teacher credentialing: reading instruction.

Impact

If enacted, SB 614 would fundamentally alter the landscape of teacher credentialing, especially how teachers are assessed on their reading instruction capabilities. By July 2022 and 2023 for different teaching credentials, respectively, the bill establishes that credentialing requirements will be based on either approved preparation program requirements or newly adopted assessments that align with the current educational frameworks. The adjustments to credentialing could help address the ongoing teacher shortage by making pathways into the teaching profession more accessible while ensuring preparation programs are rigorous and tailored to promote effective teaching practices.

Summary

Senate Bill 614, introduced by Senator Rubio, aims to amend existing laws related to teacher credentialing in California, specifically focusing on reading instruction. The bill seeks to repeal the requirement for a reading instruction competence assessment for the issuance of teaching credentials, which many argue has not demonstrably improved reading instruction or student performance in the last 25 years. The new provisions would instead encourage performance-based assessments that are believed to provide a more equitable measure of a teacher's capability to teach reading effectively, particularly for diverse student populations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 614 is mixed. Proponents argue that the bill will alleviate barriers faced by aspiring teachers, particularly candidates from diverse backgrounds who have historically struggled with standardized tests. They highlight the shift towards performance-based assessments as a significant step towards equity in teacher preparation. Critics, however, express concern that abolishing standardized assessments could compromise educational standards and the preparedness of new teachers, particularly in a state grappling with educational challenges and disparities among student populations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the concern over a potential reduction in the rigor of teacher qualification standards. Opponents fear that moving away from standardized assessments might result in less qualified teachers entering classrooms, thus negatively impacting student outcomes. The bill also addresses the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic by providing alternative pathways for those who were unable to complete the reading competence assessment due to assessment center closures, indicating a responsive approach to current educational challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB488

Teacher credentialing: reading instruction.

CA SB1263

Teacher credentialing: teaching performance assessment: workgroup.

CA AB525

Teacher credentialing.

CA AB811

Teacher credentialing: computer science instruction: workgroup.

CA AB320

Teacher preparation programs: regionally accredited institutions.

CA AB1034

Teacher credentialing: programs of professional preparation: youth mental health.

CA AB672

Civil Rights Department: community assistance.