California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB616

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Engrossed
5/29/19  
Engrossed
5/29/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Report Pass
8/21/19  
Report Pass
8/21/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Chaptered
10/7/19  
Passed
10/7/19  

Caption

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

Impact

The measures set forth in SB 616 are designed to provide greater protection for judgment debtors by specifying that certain funds in deposit accounts are exempt under defined limits, primarily to ensure necessary support for the debtor and their dependents. This includes exemptions for funds provided by FEMA without requiring a claim, which recognizes the necessity of safeguarding emergency support funds for families in distress. Furthermore, the bill enhances procedural fairness in the exemption claim process, extending the opportunity for judgment debtors to assert their rights while ensuring that judgment creditors retain a mechanism to contest unjust claims.

Summary

Senate Bill 616, sponsored by Wieckowski, aims to amend and add specific provisions to the Code of Civil Procedure concerning the enforcement of money judgments and exemptions applicable to judgment debtors. The bill facilitates the process through which debtors may claim certain property as exempt from levies, which can often lead to financial hardship for the debtor and their dependents. It notably extends timeframes for filing claims and oppositions linked to claims of exemption and introduces more clarity regarding what amounts are exempt from garnishment, thereby helping to protect the financial stability of individuals facing judgment liens.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around SB 616 appears to reflect a balance between providing necessary protections for vulnerable individuals and allowing creditors their due recourse. Proponents of the bill argue that it upholds ethical standards in financial transactions and provides essential safety nets for at-risk debtors, fostering a humane approach to debt recovery. Opponents, while acknowledging the need for some exemptions, may express concerns regarding potential abuse of the exemption claims that could impede creditors’ rights. The discussion shows a clear tension between lending fairness and fiscal responsibility.

Contention

Key points of contention include the specifics of how exemptions are defined, particularly regarding the amounts included and the determination of what constitutes necessary support for a family. There is also a broader discussion about the implications of giving debtors more leeway in claiming exemptions on their property rights, raising questions about the enforcement mechanisms available to creditors if they believe exemptions are improperly claimed. These nuances anchor the legislative discourse surrounding SB 616, highlighting the challenge inherent in balancing debtor protection with fair creditor access.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2837

Civil actions: enforcement of money judgments.

CA SB298

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA AB3283

Enforcement of judgments: claims of exemption.

CA AB774

Civil actions: enforcement of judgments.

CA SB975

Debt: coerced debts.