California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB70

Introduced
1/9/19  
Introduced
1/9/19  
Refer
1/16/19  
Refer
1/16/19  
Refer
3/19/19  
Refer
3/19/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Refer
4/30/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Engrossed
5/21/19  
Engrossed
5/21/19  
Refer
6/10/19  
Refer
6/10/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Report Pass
7/1/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Report Pass
8/15/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Chaptered
10/2/19  
Passed
10/2/19  

Caption

Electricity: undergrounding of electrical infrastructure.

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to have a substantial impact on state laws by mandating stronger oversight and accountability for electrical corporations regarding safety measures aimed at preventing wildfires. It ensures that utility companies not only provide their annual wildfire mitigation plans but also prioritizes the undergrounding of power lines in high-risk areas. This approach could potentially reduce the frequency and severity of wildfires initiated by electrical infrastructure failures, thereby promoting public safety across at-risk communities.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 70, introduced by Senator Nielsen, amends Section 8386 of the Public Utilities Code to enhance the mitigation of wildfire risks associated with electrical infrastructure. The bill mandates that each electrical corporation's wildfire mitigation plan must include an evaluation of the feasibility of undergrounding electrical distribution lines in areas identified as having the highest wildfire risk, as indicated on the commission's fire threat map. This requirement is positioned within the existing framework of the California Overhead Conversion Program, which aims to help local governments transition from overhead to underground infrastructure.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 70 appears to be supportive among safety advocates and environmental groups, as it aligns with efforts to enhance public safety and environmental protection measures. The inclusion of requirements for underground lines is largely viewed as a proactive step toward mitigating wildfire risks. However, some opposition may arise from utility companies concerned about the costs and logistical challenges involved in such infrastructural changes.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the financial and operational impact this bill may impose on electrical corporations, as it requires significant investments in their infrastructure. While the bill lays out clear measures for wildfire risk management, the transition to undergrounding power lines necessitates careful planning and execution to minimize disruptions and manage costs effectively. Critics argue that these changes could burden the utilities and ultimately lead to increased costs for consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB560

Wildfire mitigation plans: deenergizing of electrical lines: notifications: mobile telephony service providers.

CA AB280

Electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation plans.

CA AB2539

Electrical corporations: deenergization events: elections.

CA SB167

Electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation plans.

CA SB533

Electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation plans: deenergization events.

CA SB801

Electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation plans: deenergization: public safety protocol.

CA SB694

Fire prevention: electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation: workforce diversity.

CA SB1448

Fire prevention: electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation plans: workforce diversity.