State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission.
Impact
The proposed changes in SB722 are primarily focused on ensuring that the language surrounding the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission is consistent and up-to-date with current legislative practices. As the bill introduces only nonsubstantive amendments, its impact on current state laws may be minimal, as it does not alter the appointment processes or the structure of the commission itself. Instead, it seeks to refine the statutory language which could improve the clarity and functionality of governance within the commission.
Summary
Senate Bill 722, introduced by Senator Stone, aims to amend Section 25200 of the Public Resources Code pertaining to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission. This commission, as established by existing law, consists of five members appointed by the Governor and subject to confirmation by the State Senate. SB722 proposes a nonsubstantive change to this existing provision, suggesting that the language within the governing statute may require clarification or simplification, although it does not introduce new regulatory authority or modify the operational framework of the commission significantly.
Contention
While SB722 primarily makes technical adjustments rather than substantive changes, it may still evoke discussions regarding the importance of clarity in legislative texts. Opponents may argue that even nonsubstantive changes can lead to unintentional consequences if not handled carefully, potentially resulting in future legislative ambiguities or interpretational challenges. However, supporters would likely contend that such refinements are essential for maintaining an effective and transparent legislative and regulatory environment.
Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: industrial developments: oil and gas developments: refineries: petrochemical facilities: offshore wind.