California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB755

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Report Pass
1/15/20  
Report Pass
1/15/20  
Engrossed
1/23/20  
Engrossed
1/23/20  

Caption

Insurance: residential property insurance: requirements upon nonrenewal.

Impact

If enacted, SB 755 would enhance the responsibilities of insurance providers in California, ensuring that they communicate effectively with policyholders about their options following a nonrenewal of coverage. The bill aligns with existing laws that prohibit insurers from canceling or refusing to renew policies abruptly, thereby reinforcing the overall consumer protection framework in the state's insurance laws. By fostering clarity and transparency in communications, the bill aims to empower homeowners to seek and obtain necessary home insurance.

Summary

Senate Bill 755, introduced by Senator Rubio, seeks to amend Section 10095.5 of the Insurance Code regarding residential property insurance. The bill mandates that insurers who do not renew a residential property insurance policy must provide written notification to policyholders, detailing alternative options available, including information about the California FAIR Plan. This legislation aims to improve consumer awareness and access to insurance options, particularly for those who may find it challenging to acquire coverage through traditional means after a nonrenewal incident.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 755 is generally positive among consumer advocacy groups and homeowners. Proponents argue that the requirements for insurers to notify policyholders of their options will significantly benefit consumers who may otherwise struggle to navigate the complexities of insurance alternatives after a nonrenewal. However, some industry stakeholders may view this bill as an additional regulatory burden, raising concerns about the implications for insurance providers and the potential for increased operational costs.

Contention

While the intent of the bill is focused on consumer protection, there could be contention regarding the practicality of its implementation. Insurers may argue that the added requirement for written notifications could complicate and prolong their processes, especially in cases where multiple nonrenewals occur within a short timeframe. Nevertheless, the bill's proponents believe the benefits of fostering consumer understanding and access to options outweigh the potential administrative challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3166

Insurance: residential property insurance: requirements upon nonrenewal.

CA AB1875

Residential property insurance.

CA AB2260

California FAIR Plan Association.

CA AB1852

Property insurance.

CA AB3012

Residential property insurance.

CA SB505

Property insurance.

CA SB1242

Insurance.