California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB784

Introduced
3/7/19  
Introduced
3/7/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Refer
6/12/19  
Refer
6/12/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Enrolled
7/11/19  
Enrolled
7/11/19  
Chaptered
7/30/19  
Chaptered
7/30/19  
Passed
7/30/19  

Caption

Medicare supplement benefit coverage.

Impact

The change brought about by SB 784 directly affects how Medicare supplement policies are structured and marketed within California. Notably, these amendments to the Health and Safety Code and Insurance Code reflect a need to standardize benefit offerings and simplify transition for beneficiaries who become eligible for Medicare after January 1, 2020. The prohibition on selling plans that cover the Medicare Part B deductible will affect the financial options available to new beneficiaries, encouraging adjustments within the insurance industry to adapt to these changes.

Summary

Senate Bill 784, known as the Medicare Supplement Benefit Coverage Act, aims to align California state law with recent federal regulations concerning Medicare supplement policies. This legislation, effective immediately as an urgency statute, seeks to redesignate certain Medicare supplement plans, specifically plans C, F, and high deductible F, which will no longer be available to newly eligible Medicare beneficiaries as of January 1, 2020. These plans will be replaced with plans D, G, and high deductible G, which adjust coverage options particularly regarding the Medicare Part B deductible.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB 784 appears supportive among those advocating for consistency in Medicare offerings and adherence to federal guidelines. Supporters argue that this bill helps eliminate confusion for both consumers and insurers by standardizing the plans. However, some concerns may exist regarding the limitations placed on new Medicare beneficiaries in choosing comprehensive coverage options that were previously available under plans C, F, and high deductible F.

Contention

Opposition to SB 784 may stem from the perceived reduction in available benefits for newly eligible beneficiaries, particularly regarding the coverage of Medicare Part B deductibles. Critics argue that this could impose financial burdens on individuals who require extensive healthcare services. Additionally, the aspect of enforcing legal compliance concerning Medicare regulations, including the imposition of criminal penalties for willful violations, may raise questions about the adequacy of consumer protections and the overall regulatory framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB407

Medicare supplement benefit coverage.

CA SB242

Medicare supplement coverage: open enrollment periods.

CA SB1236

Medicare supplement coverage: open enrollment periods.

MN HF1790

Health insurance; preexisting condition limitations prohibited in Medicare supplement insurance policies, and Medicare supplement benefits governing provisions modified and added.

MN HF2335

Preexisting condition limitations in Medicare supplement insurance policies modified.

MN SF2498

Medicare supplement insurance policies preexisting condition limitations modification

MN SF1486

Medicare supplement insurance policies preexisting condition limitations prohibition

CA SB910

Short-term limited duration health insurance.