Planning and zoning: housing development: density.
The implementation of SB 902 is expected to significantly impact state laws related to land use and housing development. By reducing the need for conditional use permits and other discretionary reviews, the bill aims to shorten the timeline for the approval of affordable housing projects. Furthermore, local governments can pass ordinances to zone parcels for increased residential density, specifically in identified transit-rich, jobs-rich, or urban infill areas. This legislative move is rooted in a belief that enhancing housing availability will improve living conditions and support economic growth across various regions of California.
Senate Bill 902, introduced by Senator Wiener, aims to facilitate the construction of affordable housing by designating neighborhood multifamily projects as a 'use by right.' This classification allows such developments in zones where residential uses are permitted, provided they meet specified criteria, including location outside of very high fire hazard zones and not demolishing sound rental housing. The bill also seeks to streamline the approval process for these projects, minimizing local governmental review procedures that typically accompany housing developments under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). With this measure, the intent is to expedite housing construction, thereby addressing California's ongoing housing crisis.
Overall sentiment regarding SB 902 is mixed, reflecting both support for its housing-forward approach and concerns regarding potential local governance implications. Proponents argue the bill is a crucial step towards easing housing shortages and encouraging development in urban areas conducive to transit and employment opportunities. On the contrary, opponents express apprehension about stripping local control over land use decisions—fearing that essential community input may be overlooked, leading to developments that do not appropriately cater to local needs or contexts.
Noteworthy points of contention surrounding SB 902 include the balance between state mandates and local autonomy. While the bill aims to streamline housing development, some critics see it as intrusive, undermining local regulations meant to address unique community challenges. They highlight that certain localities may have developed specific zoning laws to prevent overcrowding or protect neighborhood characteristics, which could be compromised by the sweeping allowances permitted under SB 902. The ongoing dialogue centers around finding a collaborative pathway to increase affordable housing while respecting local governance systems.