California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB926

Introduced
2/5/20  
Introduced
2/5/20  
Refer
2/12/20  
Refer
2/12/20  
Refer
4/9/20  
Refer
5/13/20  
Refer
5/13/20  
Report Pass
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/18/20  
Refer
5/18/20  

Caption

Business: retail locations: cash payments.

Impact

The implementation of SB 926 is set to have a significant impact on retail establishments across California, compelling them to accommodate cash transactions. This legislative change could potentially counter the growing trend towards cashless transactions, ensuring that marginalized groups, who may rely on cash for their purchases, are not excluded from purchasing options. Additionally, the bill provides for civil penalties for non-compliance, which are to be enforced by the Attorney General and funneled into the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, thereby adding a mechanism for enforcement and accountability.

Summary

Senate Bill 926 mandates that retail locations in California must accept cash payments for transactions not exceeding $5,000. This legislation aims to protect consumer rights by ensuring that individuals can use cash, a recognized form of legal tender, for goods and services. As the bill defines cash explicitly as Federal Reserve Notes and metal coins, it aligns with existing federal laws that recognize these forms of currency. Notably, the bill also establishes that cash acceptance must persist even during declared states of emergency, unless contradicted by specific public health directives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears largely supportive among advocates for consumer rights and accessibility, who argue that cash is a crucial payment method, particularly for lower-income individuals and those without access to electronic banking. However, there may be contention from some retailers who prefer to operate cashless due to concerns about theft, accounting complexities, and transaction costs. This divide highlights the ongoing debate between modern payment methods and traditional currency forms.

Contention

Critics of the bill point to potential challenges retailers may face in adapting to this mandate, particularly small businesses that could find the requirement burdensome. There are concerns regarding the feasibility of maintaining cash transaction capabilities at multiple points of sale, especially during operational emergencies. Furthermore, issues related to denominations of cash accepted—such as the limitation on accepting bills larger than $20—also spark discussions about practicality in everyday operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI HB591

Relating To Fiduciary Access To Digital Assets.

MD HB18

Maryland General and Limited Power of Attorney Act - Alterations

MD SB851

Maryland General and Limited Power of Attorney Act - Alterations

MD SB808

Maryland General and Limited Power of Attorney Act - Assistance With Governmental Benefits and Programs

MD HB92

Maryland General and Limited Power of Attorney Act – Assistance With Governmental Benefits and Programs

UT HB0299

Court-ordered Treatment Modifications

IN SB0464

Financial institutions and consumer credit.

VT H0227

An act relating to the Vermont Uniform Power of Attorney Act