California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB973

Introduced
2/11/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Report Pass
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/18/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Report Pass
6/18/20  
Report Pass
6/18/20  
Engrossed
6/25/20  
Engrossed
6/25/20  
Refer
6/29/20  
Refer
6/29/20  
Report Pass
7/30/20  
Report Pass
7/30/20  
Refer
7/30/20  
Refer
7/30/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Chaptered
9/30/20  
Chaptered
9/30/20  

Caption

Employers: annual report: pay data.

Impact

This measure significantly affects the landscape of labor laws in California by establishing a structured protocol for employers to provide pay data reports annually. The DFEH will utilize this information to identify wage patterns, enabling targeted enforcement of equal pay and discrimination laws. Furthermore, the confidentiality provisions embedded within the bill ensure that the data submitted is protected from public disclosure, reinforcing the privacy of individuals and companies while gathering crucial labor market data.

Summary

Senate Bill 973, known as the Annual Pay Data Reporting Act, aims to enhance transparency in wage practices among large employers in California. The bill requires private employers with 100 or more employees to submit annual pay data reports to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) that include detailed information on employee demographics—specifically, race, ethnicity, and sex—across various job categories. The intent behind the bill is to address ongoing issues of wage discrimination, especially against women and people of color, by providing better data for state enforcement of equal pay laws.

Sentiment

The reception of SB 973 has been largely positive among advocacy groups championing gender equity and civil rights. Proponents view the reporting requirement as a vital step toward eliminating wage disparities based on gender and race, benefiting workers across the state. However, some business groups have expressed concerns about the additional compliance burdens placed on large employers and the potential implications for business confidentiality.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include debates about the balance between transparency and privacy. Critics argue that the required disclosures could expose sensitive business information, while supporters counter that the emphasis on confidentiality protects individual identities and helps highlight systemic issues in pay equity. Ultimately, the enactment of SB 973 reflects a broader commitment by the California legislature to confront and mitigate wage discrimination against marginalized groups in the workforce.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1340

Discrimination.

CA AB2448

Civil rights: businesses: discrimination and harassment of customers: pilot program.

CA SB873

Gender: discrimination: pricing.

CA SB224

Personal rights: civil liability and enforcement.

CA AB2662

Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

CA AB1820

Personal rights: civil liability and enforcement.

CA SB807

Enforcement of civil rights: Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

CA SB1427

Discrimination: veteran or military status.