Relative to the 2020 Census.
SR81 acknowledges that the data collected through the decennial census is vital for several reasons: it determines representation in the House of Representatives and influences the distribution of billions of dollars in federal funds to state and local governments. Additionally, census data plays a pivotal role in redistricting processes at various government levels. The steadfast effort by California leaders to address the undercount is therefore seen as essential to ensure that funding and representation accurately reflect the state's demographic makeup.
Senate Resolution No. 81 (SR81), introduced by Senators Umberg and Pan, emphasizes the critical importance of the 2020 Census to ensure an accurate and complete count of all Californians. The resolution stems from concerns regarding the longstanding issues of undercounting specific populations, particularly in a diverse state like California. It highlights the unique challenges that many residents face during the census process, particularly those lacking internet access, thus complicating online self-responses which were promoted for this year's enumeration. Recognizing the need for accuracy, the resolution underscores California's proactive steps to allocate resources and establish committees aimed at reaching out to underserved communities.
The sentiment surrounding SR81 appears to be overwhelmingly supportive, as it advocates for policies aimed at ensuring all Californians are counted fairly. The resolution was passed in the Senate without opposition and demonstrates a united commitment among legislators to improve census participation, particularly for hard-to-count populations. The collective undertaking, involving various community organizations and government agencies, signifies a strong legislative intent to engage and inform Californians about the importance of the census.
While the resolution reflects a broad consensus on the need for an accurate count, there are underlying tensions related to the methods employed to achieve this goal. Critics and some community advocates are concerned that reliance on online self-response could inadvertently increase the risk of undercounting those without reliable internet access. This raises issues of equity and accessibility, as certain demographics—especially low-income communities—may face additional barriers. Addressing these concerns is paramount for the effective implementation of outreach strategies, ensuring no group is inadvertently excluded.