California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SR9

Introduced
1/3/19  
Introduced
1/3/19  
Passed
1/7/19  

Caption

Relative to the Standing Rules of the Senate for the 2019–20 Regular Session.

Impact

The amendment of the Standing Rules is crucial for ongoing legislative efficacy and allows for the organized assignment of bills to the appropriate committees. Having defined committees facilitates a more streamlined process for bills to be debated, amended, and voted upon, significantly impacting how legislation is shaped and passed within the Senate. By clarifying these roles, SR 9 can lead to more efficient governance, allowing legislators to focus on their assigned areas of expertise.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 9 (SR 9), introduced by Senator Atkins, serves to amend the Standing Rules of the California Senate for the 2019-20 Regular Session. The bill outlines the composition and subject matter for the Senate's standing committees. By detailing the various committees and their respective jurisdictions, SR 9 aims to provide a clear framework for legislative operations. Committees such as Agriculture, Appropriations, and Banking and Financial Institutions are involved in various areas, from agriculture to public finance, and it establishes procedures that emphasize efficiency in legislative processes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SR 9 appears to be neutral, as it primarily concerns procedural amendments rather than the introduction of contentious policy. As it pertains to the structural organization of legislative processes, it does not invoke strong opinions from legislators or the general public. The lack of opposition during the voting process signifies a consensus regarding the necessity of these updates to the committee system.

Contention

While SR 9 does not present significant contention in legislative discussions, procedural bills can often spark debate regarding the implications of committee structures on legislative priorities and effectiveness. However, the unanimous support in the vote, recorded as 38 yeas to 0 nays, indicates a collective agreement on the importance of these rule amendments for proper governance in the Senate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits