California Assembly Bill AB1035

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/21
• Refer: 3/4/21
• Report Pass: 4/5/21
• Refer: 4/6/21
• Report Pass: 4/13/21
• Refer: 4/13/21
• Refer: 5/5/21
• Report Pass: 5/20/21
• Engrossed: 5/27/21
• Refer: 5/28/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 6/24/21
• Refer: 6/28/21
• Refer: 7/15/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/8/21
• Vetoed: 10/8/21

Caption

Department of Transportation and local agencies: streets and highways: recycled materials.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1035 would significantly alter the procurement and application processes for paving materials, requiring local agencies to adopt practices that promote sustainability. These changes align with California's broader goals of environmental stewardship and waste reduction. Additionally, by mandating the use of recycled materials, the bill encourages a shift towards innovative construction methods that could lead to long-term cost savings and improved road quality.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1035, introduced by Assembly Member Salas and coauthored by Senator Skinner, is focused on enhancing the use of recycled materials in the construction and maintenance of streets and highways in California. The bill amends the Public Resources Code to ensure that the Department of Transportation and local agencies, where feasible and cost-effective, utilize advanced technologies and recycling techniques that help minimize costs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The bill specifically mandates the application of standard specifications for the use of recycled materials starting January 1, 2023, aiming for a greener approach in public works projects.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 1035 in legislative discussions has largely been favorable, with many legislators recognizing the necessity of sustainable practices in infrastructure development. However, there is an underlying concern regarding the potential implications on local agency workloads and budgets. Supporters praise the bill for its environmental benefits, while those expressing caution focus on the fiscal responsibilities it imposes on local government entities to comply with state mandates.

Contention

While proponents celebrate the prospect of a more sustainable approach to highway maintenance, there are concerns about the increased duties assigned to local agencies. Critics argue that these additional responsibilities could strain resources, especially if the state does not provide adequate funding to support the costs associated with implementing the mandated specifications. The bill also includes provisions for reimbursement if significant costs are imposed on local agencies, yet questions remain regarding the efficacy of these mechanisms.