California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1105

Introduced
2/18/21  
Introduced
2/18/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
6/2/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Refer
6/16/21  
Refer
6/16/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Refer
7/15/21  

Caption

Hospital workers: COVID-19 testing.

Impact

The bill seeks to strengthen the Labor Code’s provisions regarding workplace safety by addressing the specific conditions of the ongoing pandemic. By requiring comprehensive testing and PPE supply protocols, it aims to protect healthcare workers who are on the frontline of this public health crisis. Additionally, it mandates that testing be done at no cost to health care personnel, aiming to encourage participation while safeguarding employee health and safety. However, the requirements remain in effect only until January 1, 2025, after which they will be repealed unless further legislative action is taken.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1105, introduced by Assembly Member Rodriguez, focuses on enhancing safety measures for healthcare workers in general acute care hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill mandates that employers supply personal protective equipment (PPE) to all employees, regardless of vaccination status, and implement weekly COVID-19 screening testing for healthcare personnel. It emphasizes the urgency of maintaining a safe work environment amidst ongoing challenges posed by the pandemic. Employers are also required to test all patients for COVID-19 prior to hospital admission, establishing clear protocols for monitoring and managing symptoms throughout the hospital stay.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding AB 1105 appears to be positive among advocates for healthcare workers’ rights and safety, who see it as a necessary measure to mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation logistics for employers, particularly smaller facilities that might struggle with the testing logistics and costs associated with PPE supplies. Some may perceive the mandates as burdensome, potentially leading to pushback from certain employer groups, although the public health rationale remains compelling.

Contention

While the bill predominantly seeks to enhance the safety of healthcare personnel, there are potential points of contention related to compliance costs and logistical challenges faced by hospitals in implementing mandatory weekly testing and maintaining sufficient PPE stocks. Additionally, the stipulation that no compensation is required for local agencies and school districts for costs incurred due to the act may raise concerns among local policymakers about the financial ramifications of the bill's enactment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2537

Personal protective equipment: health care employees.

CA SB1144

Water efficiency and quality assessment reports: state buildings and public school buildings.

CA SB637

Gambling: local moratorium.

CA AB619

Air quality.

SC S0054

Medical Informed Consent

CA SB1375

Workforce development: records: poverty-reducing labor standards: funds, programs, reporting, and analyses.

CA AB2699

Hazardous materials: reporting: civil liability.