California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1155

Introduced
2/18/21  
Introduced
2/18/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund.

Impact

The proposed legislation modifies existing funding mechanisms for the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund, which is established to distribute funds received from Indian tribes based on tribal-state gaming compacts. Previously, the fund's allocation prioritized payments to the Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Trust Fund first and the Office of Problem Gambling second. However, AB1155 ensures a dedicated stream of funding for prevention and treatment programs aimed at mitigating gambling disorder, thereby strengthening the state's response to gambling addiction issues. This adjustment directly aligns with the state's commitment to enhance public health initiatives related to gambling.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1155, introduced by Assembly Member Salas, seeks to amend Section 12012.85 of the Government Code related to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund in California. This bill aims to change the funding priorities of the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund, requiring that the second priority for funding be allocated to the Office of Problem Gambling. The focus is on developing and providing statewide prevention and treatment programs to address gambling disorders among the Californian population. The bill emphasizes the importance of addressing the social impacts of gambling while ensuring that funds are utilized effectively for prevention efforts.

Contention

While the bill's primary objective is to enhance support for problem gambling, there may be concerns regarding the reliance on gaming revenue to fund these prevention and treatment programs. Critics might argue that increasing emphasis on the positive aspects of gambling can overshadow the potential harms and addiction issues that arise, leading to a divergence in legislative priorities. Additionally, entities associated with gaming may have differing viewpoints on how funds should be allocated, particularly if it affects their revenue. As the bill progresses, these discussions may become pivotal in understanding the balance between support for addiction services and the interests of tribal gaming operators.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1167

California Gambling Control Commission.

CA SB351

Tribal gaming.

CA SB706

Tribal gaming: regulatory costs.

CA AB1808

Tribal gaming.

CA AB337

Tribal gaming.

CA AB2662

Sale of agricultural land: tribal first right of refusal.

CA SB286

Payment of wages: professional sports organization employees.

CA AB1935

Gaming: Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund.