California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1265

Introduced
2/19/21  
Introduced
2/19/21  
Refer
3/25/21  
Refer
3/25/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Refer
3/26/21  
Refer
3/26/21  

Caption

Pupil discipline: suspension.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1265 is expected to significantly affect California's educational landscape by restricting disciplinary actions that can be taken against students in early grades. By preventing suspensions in grades 1 to 3 and creating conditions for assessments in higher grades, the bill is intended to promote a more supportive and nurturing educational environment. The legislation encourages schools to focus on remedial measures rather than punitive responses to behavioral issues, which aligns with broader educational reforms aimed at equity and support for struggling students.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1265, introduced by Assembly Member Blanca Rubio, seeks to amend the Education Code concerning pupil discipline, particularly focusing on the suspension and expulsion policies in California schools. Specifically, the bill prohibits the suspension of pupils in kindergarten through third grade under most circumstances and introduces provisions that prevent suspensions for pupils in grades 4 to 12 if academic assessments indicate that they are performing below grade level in English language arts or literacy. This provision aims to protect younger students from punitive measures that might not address the underlying educational issues affecting their performance.

Sentiment

Sentiment around AB 1265 appears to be largely positive among educators and child advocacy groups, who see it as a progressive step toward reforming school discipline. Supporters argue that the bill will help keep young students in the classroom and provide them with the necessary support to improve academically without the fear of being expelled or suspended for behavioral issues. However, there may be concern from stakeholders who believe that some level of disciplinary action is necessary for maintaining order and accountability within schools, indicating a possible divide between traditional disciplinary perspectives and more rehabilitative approaches.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 1265 may arise from differing views on discipline in educational settings. Critics may argue that the restrictions on suspensions could limit principals and educators' authority to manage classrooms effectively. There could be fears that without the ability to impose suspensions, schools might struggle with maintaining discipline, particularly in larger classes. Additionally, the potential ambiguity surrounding the assessments that excuse suspensions could lead to challenges in implementation, raising questions about how schools will enforce the new regulations and ensure compliance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB691

Pupil attendance: truancy notifications.

CA SB237

Special education: dyslexia risk screening.

TX SB1267

Relating to continuing education and training requirements for educators and other school district personnel.

TX HB3804

Relating to continuing education and training requirements for educators and other school district personnel.

TX HB1525

Relating to the public school finance system and public education.

CA AB1121

Early literacy: professional development: instructional materials.

WI SB329

Reading instruction in public schools and private schools participating in parental choice programs, an early literacy assessment and intervention program, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

WI AB321

Reading instruction in public schools and private schools participating in parental choice programs, an early literacy assessment and intervention program, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)