California Assembly Bill AB1298

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/21
• Refer: 3/4/21
• Report Pass: 3/25/21
• Refer: 3/26/21
• Report Pass: 4/7/21
• Refer: 4/7/21
• Report Pass: 4/27/21
• Refer: 4/27/21
• Report Pass: 5/19/21
• Engrossed: 6/2/21
• Refer: 6/3/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 6/14/21
• Refer: 6/14/21
• Report Pass: 7/13/21
• Refer: 7/13/21
• Enrolled: 8/31/21
• Chaptered: 10/4/21
• Passed: 10/4/21

Caption

Pesticides: use of 2nd generation anticoagulant rodenticides.

Impact

The bill allows for the Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine when the use of 2nd generation anticoagulant rodenticides is necessary for controlling invasive rodent populations that threaten endangered species or their habitats. This shift potentially shortens bureaucratic processes, enabling quicker responses to emerging pest issues in wildlife habitats, which is significant for the protection of biodiversity in California. Moreover, it asserts that this legal change could alleviate concerns regarding the health of susceptible wildlife species while still addressing invasive species control.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1298, introduced by Assemblymember Bloom, modifies the existing regulations surrounding the use of 2nd generation anticoagulant rodenticides in California. This bill amends Section 12978.7 of the Food and Agricultural Code, primarily aimed at simplifying the process for utilizing these rodenticides when necessary for environmental protection. Specifically, it eliminates the requirement for the Director of Pesticide Regulation to certify conditions that are currently mandated for the use of these rodenticides in areas where they are otherwise prohibited.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding AB 1298 seems to be supportive among environmental protection advocates who recognize the need for effective invasive species management. However, there may also be concerns from within the community that the expanded use of rodenticides could inadvertently affect non-target species and ecosystems, leading to calls for careful monitoring and further restrictions to mitigate potential risks. Thus, while many support the bill's intent, some apprehension regarding its practical implications remains.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention arises from the balance between necessary pest control and ecological safety. Critics of the bill might express concerns over broadening the availability of these specific rodenticides, fearing it could lead to unintended consequences, such as the potential poisoning of non-target wildlife. Such discussions underline a larger debate within the environmental community about the best practices for managing invasive species while upholding biodiversity and animal welfare.