California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1327

Introduced
2/19/21  
Introduced
2/19/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Refer
3/26/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/20/21  
Refer
4/20/21  
Refer
5/5/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  

Caption

Aging in place: home modification.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1327 would significantly modify existing regulations regarding land use and environmental sustainability. The bill would enable local governments to impose stricter regulations than those at the state level, thus fostering a framework where community-specific environmental challenges can be addressed more effectively. By encouraging local agencies to engage in sustainable practices, the bill is anticipated to enhance the state's overall environmental quality and promote a culture of conservation within urban planning.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1327 aims to enhance environmental protections while promoting sustainable infrastructure development across the state. The bill emphasizes a balanced approach, ensuring that economic growth does not come at the expense of environmental health. Proponents of the bill argue that it will foster responsible development practices, encouraging local governments to adopt measures that are both environmentally friendly and economically viable. This includes provisions related to land use, resource allocation, and compliance with state environmental regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1327 has generally been positive among environmental advocates, who view it as a crucial step towards greater accountability in development practices. Many believe that the bill aligns with emerging trends towards sustainability and reflects increased public interest in environmental issues. However, there are also concerns from some business groups and land developers who fear that additional regulations could hinder economic growth and lead to increased costs associated with compliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between economic development and environmental protection. Critics of the bill argue that the proposed regulations could lead to overreach by local governments and potentially stifle economic activity, particularly in areas where development is already underway. There is also debate surrounding the adequacy of state funding to support local governments in implementing these new measures, with some suggesting that the burden of additional regulations may be unsustainable without proper financial support.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB717

Department of Technology: broadband communications: report.

CA SB1249

Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act.

CA SB639

Medical professionals: course requirements.

CA AB661

The California Guaranteed Income Statewide Feasibility Study Act.

CA AB2636

Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act.

CA SB657

Homelessness services staff training.

CA AB1043

Alzheimer’s Day Care Resource Center Program.

CA AB2158

Alzheimer’s Day Care Resource Center Program.