California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1330

Introduced
2/19/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/21/21  
Report Pass
4/21/21  
Engrossed
4/29/21  
Refer
5/3/21  
Refer
5/3/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Report Pass
6/3/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Report Pass
6/30/21  
Report Pass
6/30/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Report Pass
7/6/21  
Refer
7/6/21  
Refer
7/6/21  
Refer
6/9/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Refer
8/22/22  
Refer
8/22/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Chaptered
9/13/22  
Chaptered
9/13/22  
Passed
9/13/22  

Caption

Alcoholic beverage tied-house restrictions: exceptions: County of Riverside.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1330 would potentially enhance the advertising capabilities of alcohol manufacturers in Riverside by creating new avenues for reaching customers through major events in large venues. This change in the law is intended to stimulate local economic development by leveraging significant entertainment venues and could lead to increased revenue for both the venues and local businesses. Nonetheless, it also expands the definition of a crime related to coercion in advertising contracts, thereby introducing regulatory compliance challenges.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1330 amends Section 25503.6 of the Business and Professions Code, specifically targeting the tied-house restrictions that govern the advertising of alcoholic beverages. The bill seeks to create exceptions for fully enclosed arenas with a seating capacity over 10,000 located in the County of Riverside, allowing licensed manufacturers of beer, wine, and distilled spirits to purchase advertising space in such venues. The amendment is part of a broader framework to regulate advertising practices in the alcoholic beverage industry while accommodating specific local economic needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1330 appears largely favorable among stakeholders interested in economic growth, particularly those associated with large venues and alcoholic beverage manufacturers. Proponents view the bill as a valuable opportunity to boost local revenues and enhance market visibility for products. However, there are concerns raised by some community voices about the potential for aggressive marketing practices and the implications of further entrenching alcohol advertising in public spaces, leading to a more cautious reception among advocacy groups focused on public health.

Contention

The principal points of contention revolve around the expansion of tied-house restrictions, with critics arguing that relaxing these laws could lead to undesirable commercial influences in significant public events. Additionally, the necessity for legislative exceptions specifically tailored to the County of Riverside has raised discussions about fairness and equality in regulatory treatment across different regions in California. The inclusion of provisions ensuring compliance with existing contract laws further complicates negotiations, as parties must navigate the intersection of new advertising freedoms while adhering to the overarching framework established by previous laws.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB582

Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: advertising.

CA SB664

Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: advertising.

CA AB2146

Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: advertising.

CA SB1280

Tied-house restrictions: advertising: San Diego State University.

CA AB1724

Alcoholic beverages: licenses: suspension and revocation tied-house exception.

CA AB98

Tied-house restrictions: advertising exceptions: City of San Jose.