California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB162

Introduced
1/8/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Report Pass
2/18/21  
Refer
2/22/21  
Refer
2/22/21  
Engrossed
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
9/4/21  
Report Pass
9/4/21  
Refer
9/4/21  
Report Pass
9/7/21  
Report Pass
9/7/21  
Refer
1/6/22  
Report Pass
2/16/22  
Report Pass
2/16/22  
Refer
2/16/22  

Caption

Budget Act of 2022.

Impact

The proposed impact of AB 162 includes the establishment of high road transition collaboratives that will facilitate financial support essential for economic recovery activities. Such initiatives aim to align workforce training and education with the evolving economic landscape, thereby improving job creation and enhancing the quality of employment across affected sectors. Additionally, the bill outlines the responsibilities of an Inter-Agency Leadership Team responsible for overseeing and administering the program, ensuring a collaborative approach among state agencies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 162, officially titled the Community Economic Resilience Fund Program, aims to establish a framework for economic recovery in California, particularly targeting regions disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill authorizes the appropriation of $600 million from the Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund of 2021 to support this initiative, which is managed by the Workforce Services Branch of the Employment Development Department (EDD). This substantial allocation is positioned to provide both planning and implementation grants for economic recovery collaboratives across various regions of the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 162 appears to be positive, particularly among legislators and agencies focused on economic development and workforce training. Supporters argue that the bill will not only stimulate economic growth but also promote equity in recovery efforts by focusing resources on communities hit hardest by the pandemic. However, the specifics of implementation, such as the criteria for receiving grants and the oversight of funding, may invite scrutiny during discussions on its execution.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise related to the distribution of grant funds and the priorities set by the Inter-Agency Leadership Team. Critics could express concerns regarding the adequacy of oversight and whether the funds will be allocated effectively to achieve meaningful economic recovery. Additionally, ensuring that the program serves a diverse array of communities and sectors will be crucial in meeting the bill's stated goals, potentially leading to discussions on fairness and transparency in the grant award process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB162

Community Economic Resilience Fund Program.

CA AB1929

Career technical education: data collection.

CA AB2058

Career technical education: California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program: Strong Workforce Program.

CA AB1303

School facilities: Civic Center Act: direct costs.

CA AB2342

Community Economic Resilience Fund Program.

CA AB377

Career technical education: California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program: Strong Workforce Program.

CA AB290

Career technical education: California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program: Strong Workforce Program.

CA SB1321

Employment Training Panel: employment training program: projects and proposals.