California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1712

Introduced
1/26/22  
Refer
2/3/22  
Refer
2/3/22  
Report Pass
3/16/22  
Report Pass
3/16/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/11/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Enrolled
8/18/22  
Enrolled
8/18/22  
Chaptered
9/30/22  
Passed
9/30/22  

Caption

Public postsecondary education: campus safety: online survey tool.

Impact

The implications of AB 1712 are significant for educational institutions across California. By requiring their participation in a federally recognized survey, the bill aims to hold schools accountable for creating safe learning environments. Failure to comply or to implement recommendations derived from survey results may negatively affect public perceptions of these institutions, potentially impacting enrollment and funding. Furthermore, since the bill imposes new obligations on community college districts, it initiates a state-mandated local program, which may bring about financial implications concerning compliance costs.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1712, introduced by Medina, focuses on campus safety within public postsecondary education institutions in California. The bill mandates that the California Community Colleges and the California State University develop questions in trauma-informed language for an online survey aimed at assessing campus climate. This online survey is based on federal requirements and seeks to gather insights into students' perspectives on the safety and environment of their campuses. By incorporating the recommendations of students and trauma experts, the bill hopes to foster a safer and more supportive educational atmosphere.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1712 notably skews in favor of enhancing campus safety and student well-being. Advocates argue that the emphasis on trauma-informed practices is essential for understanding the complex experiences of students, especially those from vulnerable backgrounds. However, some critics may voice concerns about the feasibility of implementation or question the effectiveness of such surveys in genuinely improving campus conditions. Overall, the proposed legislation has been met with general support, particularly from student advocacy groups and education committees.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding AB 1712 is the requirement for the development and submission of survey questions to the United States Secretary of Education. This adds a layer of federal oversight to the state's educational policies, which some may perceive as an infringement on state autonomy. Additionally, while the bill aims to improve campus climate, the discussion about maintaining the integrity of the survey process is crucial to ensure valid and actionable feedback, which could lead to debates on methodological approaches and data privacy concerns.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB644

Public postsecondary education: campus safety: hate crime: surveys.

CA AB2821

Postsecondary education: students with disabilities.

CA SB1348

Postsecondary education: allied health professional clinical programs: reporting.

CA AB21

Public postsecondary education: Access to Higher Education for Every Student.

CA AB2047

Public postsecondary education: discrimination prevention.

CA AB2009

Postsecondary education: training for drivers of commercial trucks: human trafficking awareness training.

CA SB512

Public postsecondary education: support services for foster youth: Cooperating Agencies Foster Youth Educational Support Program.

CA AB1705

Seymour-Campbell Student Success Act of 2012: matriculation: assessment.