California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1754

Introduced
2/1/22  

Caption

Debt Collection Licensing Act: collection agencies.

Impact

The bill's implications for state laws revolve around increased accountability within the debt collection field. By including more entities under the debt collection regulations, AB1754 aims to prevent potential abuses associated with home and vehicle repossession processes. Current law requires that entities engaging in debt collection must be licensed; therefore, this change will ensure that a broader range of actors in the debt collection ecosystem are adhering to legal standards designed to protect consumers. Supporters argue that this bill minimizes risks of consumer harm and promotes fair practices across debt collection agencies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1754, introduced by Assembly Member Chen, seeks to amend the Debt Collection Licensing Act in California. The bill expands the definition of a collection agency to include entities that operate as brokers or intermediaries for repossession assignments. This change aims to enhance the regulation and oversight of debt collectors in the state, ensuring that all parties involved in debt collection – including those who act as a middleman – are subject to the same licensing requirements under the law. This expansion of the definition not only imposes new regulatory responsibilities but also broadens the reach of existing oversight mechanisms established by the Commissioner of Business Oversight.

Contention

Despite its intended consumer protections, AB1754 also raises concerns about the expansion of regulatory oversight. Stakeholders, including some in the financial lending industry, worry that these additional regulatory burdens could stifle business operation flexibility and increase costs for consumers seeking loans. Critics of the expansion argue that the complexity of compliance may unintentionally harm smaller businesses that struggle to meet the new requirements. Furthermore, the discussion about whether the state should mandate specific practices in the private sector continues to evoke debate regarding the balance between consumer advocacy and business autonomy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1324

Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: rental debt.

CA SB750

Debt collection agencies: licensure and regulation.

CA SB908

Debt collectors: licensing and regulation: Debt Collection Licensing Act.

CA AB2953

California Financing Law: consumer loans: title loans.

CA SB482

Consumer loans: restrictions.

CA SB771

California Financing Law: consumer loans: motor vehicles.

CA AB1109

Consumer loans.

CA AB2501

COVID-19: homeowner, tenant, and consumer relief.