California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1790 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1790Introduced by Assembly Member CervantesFebruary 03, 2022 An act to amend add Section 1347 of 1347.2 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal law. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1790, as amended, Cervantes. Criminal law: child witnesses.Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings.This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision. apply this provision to criminal proceedings in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per and expand it to include any victim witness. The bill would authorize a court to order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and be communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes specified findings. The bill would require the prosecution to give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless they show good cause to the court.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1347.2 is added to the Penal Code, to read:1347.2. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a victim, the rights of the pro per defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the pro per defendant against the need to protect a victim and to preserve the integrity of the courts truth-finding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the victim is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The victims testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of an alleged stalking offense specified in Section 646.9.(2) The impact on the victim of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the victim unavailable as a witness unless remote testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the victim in the presence of the pro per defendant would result in the victim suffering serious emotional distress so that the victim would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The pro per defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The pro per defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the victim or the victims family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the victim or a member of the victims family, in order to prevent or dissuade the victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the victim from reporting the alleged offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The pro per defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim in the commission of the offense.(E) The pro per defendant behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the victim to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the victim, the relationship between the victim and the pro per defendant, any handicap or disability of the victim, and the nature of the acts charged. The victims refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the victims testimony.(3) The equipment available for remote proceedings would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the victim to the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys.(c) The prosecution shall give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the victim to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the victim has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on a victim of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the victim is unavailable as a witness unless remote proceedings are used, the court may question the victim in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person and the prosecutor present. The pro per defendant shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the victim and shall not permit the prosecutor or pro per defendant to examine the victim. The prosecutor and pro per defendant shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of remote proceedings as a means of facilitating the testimony of the victim.(3) Instruct the prosecutor and pro per defendant, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of remote proceedings.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the victim.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the victim, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney and the pro per defendant during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the victim, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, any technicians necessary to assist in operating the remote technology, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, may be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the victim and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the victim to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the pro per defendant as the court deems necessary.(h) The examination shall be under oath, and the pro per defendant shall be able to see and hear the victim witness, and if remote proceedings are utilized, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(i) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(j) The cost of examination by contemporaneous remote technology ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.SECTION 1.Section 1347 of the Penal Code is amended to read:1347.(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b)Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1)The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A)An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B)An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C)An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2)The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A)Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B)The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C)The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D)The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E)The defendant or the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3)The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c)If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d)(1)The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2)Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3)In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1)Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2)Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3)Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4)Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5)Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i)The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j)Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k)The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l)Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
1+CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1790Introduced by Assembly Member CervantesFebruary 03, 2022 An act to amend Section 1347 of the Penal Code, relating to criminal law. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1790, as introduced, Cervantes. Criminal law: child witnesses.Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings.This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1347 of the Penal Code is amended to read:1347. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E) The defendant or his or her the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his or her their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that he or she is they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and his or her their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of his or her their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
22
3- Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1790Introduced by Assembly Member CervantesFebruary 03, 2022 An act to amend add Section 1347 of 1347.2 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal law. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1790, as amended, Cervantes. Criminal law: child witnesses.Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings.This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision. apply this provision to criminal proceedings in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per and expand it to include any victim witness. The bill would authorize a court to order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and be communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes specified findings. The bill would require the prosecution to give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless they show good cause to the court.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
3+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1790Introduced by Assembly Member CervantesFebruary 03, 2022 An act to amend Section 1347 of the Penal Code, relating to criminal law. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1790, as introduced, Cervantes. Criminal law: child witnesses.Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings.This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
44
5- Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022
65
7-Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022
6+
7+
88
99 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION
1010
1111 Assembly Bill
1212
1313 No. 1790
1414
1515 Introduced by Assembly Member CervantesFebruary 03, 2022
1616
1717 Introduced by Assembly Member Cervantes
1818 February 03, 2022
1919
20- An act to amend add Section 1347 of 1347.2 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal law.
20+ An act to amend Section 1347 of the Penal Code, relating to criminal law.
2121
2222 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2323
2424 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2525
26-AB 1790, as amended, Cervantes. Criminal law: child witnesses.
26+AB 1790, as introduced, Cervantes. Criminal law: child witnesses.
2727
28-Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings.This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision. apply this provision to criminal proceedings in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per and expand it to include any victim witness. The bill would authorize a court to order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and be communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes specified findings. The bill would require the prosecution to give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless they show good cause to the court.
28+Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings.This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.
2929
3030 Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings.
3131
32-This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision. apply this provision to criminal proceedings in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per and expand it to include any victim witness. The bill would authorize a court to order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and be communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes specified findings. The bill would require the prosecution to give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless they show good cause to the court.
32+This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.
3333
3434 ## Digest Key
3535
3636 ## Bill Text
3737
38-The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1347.2 is added to the Penal Code, to read:1347.2. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a victim, the rights of the pro per defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the pro per defendant against the need to protect a victim and to preserve the integrity of the courts truth-finding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the victim is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The victims testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of an alleged stalking offense specified in Section 646.9.(2) The impact on the victim of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the victim unavailable as a witness unless remote testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the victim in the presence of the pro per defendant would result in the victim suffering serious emotional distress so that the victim would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The pro per defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The pro per defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the victim or the victims family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the victim or a member of the victims family, in order to prevent or dissuade the victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the victim from reporting the alleged offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The pro per defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim in the commission of the offense.(E) The pro per defendant behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the victim to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the victim, the relationship between the victim and the pro per defendant, any handicap or disability of the victim, and the nature of the acts charged. The victims refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the victims testimony.(3) The equipment available for remote proceedings would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the victim to the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys.(c) The prosecution shall give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the victim to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the victim has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on a victim of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the victim is unavailable as a witness unless remote proceedings are used, the court may question the victim in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person and the prosecutor present. The pro per defendant shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the victim and shall not permit the prosecutor or pro per defendant to examine the victim. The prosecutor and pro per defendant shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of remote proceedings as a means of facilitating the testimony of the victim.(3) Instruct the prosecutor and pro per defendant, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of remote proceedings.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the victim.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the victim, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney and the pro per defendant during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the victim, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, any technicians necessary to assist in operating the remote technology, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, may be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the victim and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the victim to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the pro per defendant as the court deems necessary.(h) The examination shall be under oath, and the pro per defendant shall be able to see and hear the victim witness, and if remote proceedings are utilized, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(i) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(j) The cost of examination by contemporaneous remote technology ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.SECTION 1.Section 1347 of the Penal Code is amended to read:1347.(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b)Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1)The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A)An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B)An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C)An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2)The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A)Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B)The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C)The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D)The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E)The defendant or the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3)The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c)If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d)(1)The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2)Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3)In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1)Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2)Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3)Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4)Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5)Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i)The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j)Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k)The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l)Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
38+The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1347 of the Penal Code is amended to read:1347. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E) The defendant or his or her the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his or her their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that he or she is they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and his or her their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of his or her their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
3939
4040 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4141
4242 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4343
44-SECTION 1. Section 1347.2 is added to the Penal Code, to read:1347.2. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a victim, the rights of the pro per defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the pro per defendant against the need to protect a victim and to preserve the integrity of the courts truth-finding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the victim is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The victims testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of an alleged stalking offense specified in Section 646.9.(2) The impact on the victim of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the victim unavailable as a witness unless remote testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the victim in the presence of the pro per defendant would result in the victim suffering serious emotional distress so that the victim would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The pro per defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The pro per defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the victim or the victims family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the victim or a member of the victims family, in order to prevent or dissuade the victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the victim from reporting the alleged offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The pro per defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim in the commission of the offense.(E) The pro per defendant behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the victim to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the victim, the relationship between the victim and the pro per defendant, any handicap or disability of the victim, and the nature of the acts charged. The victims refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the victims testimony.(3) The equipment available for remote proceedings would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the victim to the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys.(c) The prosecution shall give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the victim to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the victim has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on a victim of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the victim is unavailable as a witness unless remote proceedings are used, the court may question the victim in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person and the prosecutor present. The pro per defendant shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the victim and shall not permit the prosecutor or pro per defendant to examine the victim. The prosecutor and pro per defendant shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of remote proceedings as a means of facilitating the testimony of the victim.(3) Instruct the prosecutor and pro per defendant, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of remote proceedings.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the victim.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the victim, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney and the pro per defendant during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the victim, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, any technicians necessary to assist in operating the remote technology, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, may be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the victim and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the victim to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the pro per defendant as the court deems necessary.(h) The examination shall be under oath, and the pro per defendant shall be able to see and hear the victim witness, and if remote proceedings are utilized, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(i) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(j) The cost of examination by contemporaneous remote technology ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.
44+SECTION 1. Section 1347 of the Penal Code is amended to read:1347. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E) The defendant or his or her the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his or her their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that he or she is they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and his or her their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of his or her their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
4545
46-SECTION 1. Section 1347.2 is added to the Penal Code, to read:
46+SECTION 1. Section 1347 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
4747
4848 ### SECTION 1.
4949
50-1347.2. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a victim, the rights of the pro per defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the pro per defendant against the need to protect a victim and to preserve the integrity of the courts truth-finding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the victim is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The victims testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of an alleged stalking offense specified in Section 646.9.(2) The impact on the victim of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the victim unavailable as a witness unless remote testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the victim in the presence of the pro per defendant would result in the victim suffering serious emotional distress so that the victim would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The pro per defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The pro per defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the victim or the victims family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the victim or a member of the victims family, in order to prevent or dissuade the victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the victim from reporting the alleged offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The pro per defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim in the commission of the offense.(E) The pro per defendant behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the victim to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the victim, the relationship between the victim and the pro per defendant, any handicap or disability of the victim, and the nature of the acts charged. The victims refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the victims testimony.(3) The equipment available for remote proceedings would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the victim to the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys.(c) The prosecution shall give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the victim to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the victim has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on a victim of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the victim is unavailable as a witness unless remote proceedings are used, the court may question the victim in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person and the prosecutor present. The pro per defendant shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the victim and shall not permit the prosecutor or pro per defendant to examine the victim. The prosecutor and pro per defendant shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of remote proceedings as a means of facilitating the testimony of the victim.(3) Instruct the prosecutor and pro per defendant, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of remote proceedings.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the victim.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the victim, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney and the pro per defendant during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the victim, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, any technicians necessary to assist in operating the remote technology, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, may be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the victim and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the victim to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the pro per defendant as the court deems necessary.(h) The examination shall be under oath, and the pro per defendant shall be able to see and hear the victim witness, and if remote proceedings are utilized, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(i) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(j) The cost of examination by contemporaneous remote technology ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.
50+1347. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E) The defendant or his or her the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his or her their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that he or she is they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and his or her their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of his or her their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
5151
52-1347.2. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a victim, the rights of the pro per defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the pro per defendant against the need to protect a victim and to preserve the integrity of the courts truth-finding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the victim is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The victims testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of an alleged stalking offense specified in Section 646.9.(2) The impact on the victim of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the victim unavailable as a witness unless remote testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the victim in the presence of the pro per defendant would result in the victim suffering serious emotional distress so that the victim would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The pro per defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The pro per defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the victim or the victims family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the victim or a member of the victims family, in order to prevent or dissuade the victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the victim from reporting the alleged offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The pro per defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim in the commission of the offense.(E) The pro per defendant behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the victim to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the victim, the relationship between the victim and the pro per defendant, any handicap or disability of the victim, and the nature of the acts charged. The victims refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the victims testimony.(3) The equipment available for remote proceedings would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the victim to the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys.(c) The prosecution shall give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the victim to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the victim has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on a victim of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the victim is unavailable as a witness unless remote proceedings are used, the court may question the victim in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person and the prosecutor present. The pro per defendant shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the victim and shall not permit the prosecutor or pro per defendant to examine the victim. The prosecutor and pro per defendant shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of remote proceedings as a means of facilitating the testimony of the victim.(3) Instruct the prosecutor and pro per defendant, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of remote proceedings.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the victim.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the victim, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney and the pro per defendant during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the victim, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, any technicians necessary to assist in operating the remote technology, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, may be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the victim and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the victim to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the pro per defendant as the court deems necessary.(h) The examination shall be under oath, and the pro per defendant shall be able to see and hear the victim witness, and if remote proceedings are utilized, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(i) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(j) The cost of examination by contemporaneous remote technology ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.
52+1347. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E) The defendant or his or her the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his or her their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that he or she is they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and his or her their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of his or her their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
5353
54-1347.2. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a victim, the rights of the pro per defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the pro per defendant against the need to protect a victim and to preserve the integrity of the courts truth-finding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the victim is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The victims testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of an alleged stalking offense specified in Section 646.9.(2) The impact on the victim of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the victim unavailable as a witness unless remote testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the victim in the presence of the pro per defendant would result in the victim suffering serious emotional distress so that the victim would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The pro per defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The pro per defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the victim or the victims family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the victim or a member of the victims family, in order to prevent or dissuade the victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the victim from reporting the alleged offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The pro per defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim in the commission of the offense.(E) The pro per defendant behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the victim to be unable to continue their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the victim, the relationship between the victim and the pro per defendant, any handicap or disability of the victim, and the nature of the acts charged. The victims refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the victims testimony.(3) The equipment available for remote proceedings would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the victim to the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys.(c) The prosecution shall give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the victim to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the victim has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on a victim of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the victim is unavailable as a witness unless remote proceedings are used, the court may question the victim in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person and the prosecutor present. The pro per defendant shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the victim and shall not permit the prosecutor or pro per defendant to examine the victim. The prosecutor and pro per defendant shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of remote proceedings as a means of facilitating the testimony of the victim.(3) Instruct the prosecutor and pro per defendant, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of remote proceedings.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the victim.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the victim, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney and the pro per defendant during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the victim, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, any technicians necessary to assist in operating the remote technology, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, may be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the victim and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the victim to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the pro per defendant as the court deems necessary.(h) The examination shall be under oath, and the pro per defendant shall be able to see and hear the victim witness, and if remote proceedings are utilized, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(i) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(j) The cost of examination by contemporaneous remote technology ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.
54+1347. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:(1) The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:(A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.(B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.(C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.(2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.(A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.(B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.(C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.(D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.(E) The defendant or his or her the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his or her their testimony.In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.(3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.(c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.(d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.(3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.(e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.(3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that he or she is they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.(f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and his or her their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.(g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of his or her their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.(h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.(i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.(j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.(k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.
5555
5656
5757
58-1347.2. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a victim, the rights of the pro per defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the pro per defendant against the need to protect a victim and to preserve the integrity of the courts truth-finding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.
58+1347. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.
5959
60-(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is representing themselves pro per, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the victim is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a victim be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by remote technology, if the court makes all of the following findings:
60+(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:
6161
62-(1) The victims testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of an alleged stalking offense specified in Section 646.9.
62+(1) The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:
6363
64-(2) The impact on the victim of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the victim unavailable as a witness unless remote testimony is used.
64+(A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.
6565
66-(A) Testimony by the victim in the presence of the pro per defendant would result in the victim suffering serious emotional distress so that the victim would be unavailable as a witness.
66+(B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.
6767
68-(B) The pro per defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.
68+(C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.
6969
70-(C) The pro per defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the victim or the victims family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the victim or a member of the victims family, in order to prevent or dissuade the victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the victim from reporting the alleged offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.
70+(2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.
7171
72-(D) The pro per defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim in the commission of the offense.
72+(A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.
7373
74-(E) The pro per defendant behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the victim to be unable to continue their testimony.
74+(B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.
7575
76-In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the victim, the relationship between the victim and the pro per defendant, any handicap or disability of the victim, and the nature of the acts charged. The victims refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the victims testimony.
76+(C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.
7777
78-(3) The equipment available for remote proceedings would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the victim to the judge, jury, pro per defendant, and attorneys.
78+(D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.
7979
80-(c) The prosecution shall give the pro per defendant at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek to conduct remote proceedings, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.
80+(E) The defendant or his or her the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his or her their testimony.
81+
82+In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.
83+
84+(3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.
85+
86+(c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.
8187
8288 (d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.
8389
84-(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the victim to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the victim has not testified.
90+(2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.
8591
86-(3) In determining whether the impact on a victim of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the victim is unavailable as a witness unless remote proceedings are used, the court may question the victim in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person and the prosecutor present. The pro per defendant shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the victim and shall not permit the prosecutor or pro per defendant to examine the victim. The prosecutor and pro per defendant shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers.
92+(3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.
8793
88-(e) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:
94+(e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:
8995
9096 (1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.
9197
92-(2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of remote proceedings as a means of facilitating the testimony of the victim.
93-
94-(3) Instruct the prosecutor and pro per defendant, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of remote proceedings.
95-
96-(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the victim.
97-
98-(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the victim, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney and the pro per defendant during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.
99-
100-(f) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the victim, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, any technicians necessary to assist in operating the remote technology, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, may be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the victim and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.
101-
102-(g) When the court orders the testimony of a victim to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the victim to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the pro per defendant as the court deems necessary.
103-
104-(h) The examination shall be under oath, and the pro per defendant shall be able to see and hear the victim witness, and if remote proceedings are utilized, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.
105-
106-(i) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.
107-
108-(j) The cost of examination by contemporaneous remote technology ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.
109-
110-
111-
112-
113-
114-(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the courts truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used selectively when the facts and circumstances in an individual case present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative procedures.
115-
116-
117-
118-(b)Notwithstanding any other law, the court in a criminal proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course of the proceeding on the courts own motion, may order that the testimony of a minor 13 years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television, if the court makes all of the following findings:
119-
120-
121-
122-(1)The minors testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of any of the following:
123-
124-
125-
126-(A)An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.
127-
128-
129-
130-(B)An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.
131-
132-
133-
134-(C)An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of which the minor is a victim.
135-
136-
137-
138-(2)The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.
139-
140-
141-
142-(A)Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the child would be unavailable as a witness.
143-
144-
145-
146-(B)The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the offense.
147-
148-
149-
150-(C)The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or the childs family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the child or a member of the childs family, threatened removal of the child from the childs family, or threatened the dissolution of the childs family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from assisting in criminal prosecution.
151-
152-
153-
154-(D)The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in the commission of the offense.
155-
156-
157-
158-(E)The defendant or the defendants counsel behaved during the hearing or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue their testimony.
159-
160-
161-
162-In making the determination required by this section, the court shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minors refusal to testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain the minors testimony.
163-
164-
165-
166-(3)The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.
167-
168-
169-
170-(c)If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television, two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants at least 30 days written notice of the prosecutions intent to seek the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless the prosecution shows good cause to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not apply.
171-
172-
173-
174-(d)(1)The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.
175-
176-
177-
178-(2)Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.
179-
180-
181-
182-(3)In determining whether the impact on an individual child of one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used, the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor, and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion of the session in chambers.
183-
184-
185-
186-(e)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the following:
187-
188-
189-
190-(1)Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful, reasonable, and equitable manner.
191-
192-
193-
19498 (2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of facilitating the testimony of the minor.
195-
196-
19799
198100 (3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.
199101
102+(4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that he or she is they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.
200103
104+(5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.
201105
202-(4)Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the jury, that they are not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.
106+(f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and his or her their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.
203107
204-
205-
206-(5)Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor, including the images and voices of all persons who in any way participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and their attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.
207-
208-
209-
210-(f)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and, after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of the minor and their testimony, and a separate video recording device shall record the image of the support person.
211-
212-
213-
214-(g)When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.
215-
216-
108+(g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into the judges chambers prior to the taking of his or her their testimony to meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the minor during this meeting.
217109
218110 (h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.
219111
220-
221-
222112 (i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendants image shall be transmitted live to the witness.
223-
224-
225113
226114 (j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.
227115
228-
229-
230116 (k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the court out of its existing budget.
231-
232-
233117
234118 (l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit testimony.