California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1813

Introduced
2/7/22  
Introduced
2/7/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Report Pass
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Report Pass
5/3/22  
Report Pass
5/3/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/14/22  
Report Pass
6/14/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Enrolled
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/11/22  
Chaptered
8/26/22  
Passed
8/26/22  

Caption

State Athletic Commission Act: officers and personnel.

Impact

If enacted, AB1813 would significantly impact the legal framework of state athletics by formalizing the roles and duties of commission members. This could result in improved safety protocols and regulatory practices within the sports industry, ensuring that events are conducted according to established standards. The bill intends to bolster the authority of the state athletic commission, which may lead to enhanced accountability for those involved in the administration of sports, including promoters, referees, and athletes themselves.

Summary

AB1813, known as the State Athletic Commission Act, aims to establish a comprehensive framework governing the operations of state athletic commissions, which oversee various professional and amateur sporting events. The bill outlines the responsibilities and authority of commission officers and personnel in ensuring safety, fairness, and integrity in athletic competitions across the state. By setting forth clear guidelines, the bill seeks to enhance the regulatory structure surrounding sporting events and provide better oversight of athletes and organizations involved in athletics.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB1813 appears supportive, particularly among those involved in the sports administration and regulatory sectors. Advocates perceive the bill as a necessary step in modernizing the oversight of sports, highlighting the importance of maintaining integrity and safety standards in athletic competitions. However, there may be some concerns from smaller organizations about the potential implications of increased regulation and oversight, which could pose additional burdens to their operations.

Contention

While the bill is largely viewed positively, there are underlying discussions regarding the balance of regulation and autonomy for sports organizations. Some stakeholders may argue that heightened regulation could stifle innovation or create hurdles for emerging sports leagues. The tension lies in finding a suitable balance between ensuring safety and fairness in sports while allowing flexibility for organizations to operate effectively. The debate around AB1813 centers on how best to achieve a regulatory framework that protects athletes and the integrity of sports without imposing excessive restrictions on the industry's growth.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1456

State Athletic Commission Act.

CA AB173

Transportation budget trailer bill.

CA SB173

Transportation budget trailer bill.

CA SB830

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation: Inspector General.

CA AB21

Common interest developments: association management and meeting procedures.

CA SB87

Transportation.

CA AB87

Transportation.

CA AB1129

Home Inspectors License Law.