California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1909

Introduced
2/9/22  
Introduced
2/9/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Report Pass
3/21/22  
Report Pass
3/21/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Engrossed
5/2/22  
Engrossed
5/2/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Enrolled
8/23/22  
Enrolled
8/23/22  
Chaptered
9/16/22  
Passed
9/16/22  

Caption

Vehicles: bicycle omnibus bill.

Impact

The bill makes notable adjustments to how bicycles, particularly electric bicycles, are integrated with existing vehicle laws. For instance, it mandates vehicles to change lanes when passing bicycles unless impractical, enhancing roadway safety. It also protects local jurisdictions from needing to enforce bicycle licensing requirements, thereby reducing barriers for bicycle operation within local areas. However, the repeal of bicycle licensing ordinances may draw concerns from some quarters regarding safety and accountability in bicycle operations. This legislation embodies a balance between facilitating bicycle use and ensuring safe cycling conditions in urban areas.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1909, also known as the Bicycle Omnibus Bill, is an act designed to revise and update various provisions of the Vehicle Code as they pertain to bicycles. The bill allows local authorities the ability to regulate the use of electric bicycles on certain trails and paths, specifically removing previous prohibitions on class 3 electric bicycles on these routes. Additionally, it empowers the Department of Parks and Recreation to prohibit these bicycles on specific bike paths under its jurisdiction. This marks a significant shift in promoting the use of electric bicycles in California, aiming to provide more mobility options for cyclists while maintaining safety protocols on shared pathways.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 1909 is mixed but leans towards acceptance among proponents of cycling and electric transportation. Supporters hail the bill as a progressive step towards improving cycling infrastructure and electric mobility options, viewing it as a necessary update for modern urban environments. On the contrary, some concerns have been raised regarding potential overreach with local governance and the possible implications for bicycle safety regulation. This has led to discussions about finding the right balance between encouraging electric bicycle use and mitigating risks on shared roads and paths.

Contention

Key points of contention include the potential for local authorities to have more control over the management of electric bicycles, with some groups viewing the repeal of licensing as a setback for bicycle safety accountability. Additionally, while enabling more flexibility for the operation of electric bicycles, questions remain about the adequacy of current infrastructure to support the increased presence of electric bicycles, particularly on existing trails and roads. The interactions between pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists are central to the debate, as stakeholders seek to enhance safety for all users of California's transportation networks.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2147

Pedestrians.

CA AB390

Pedestrian crossing signals.

CA SB671

Pedestrian crossing signals.

CA AB2264

Pedestrian crossing signals.

MN SF1836

Authority limitation to issue certain citations to pedestrians