California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1982

Introduced
2/10/22  
Introduced
2/10/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/16/22  
Report Pass
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Refer
8/1/22  
Refer
8/1/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Chaptered
9/25/22  
Passed
9/25/22  

Caption

Telehealth: dental care.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1982 will enhance existing regulations under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act by requiring additional disclosures surrounding the dental services provided via telehealth. This may result in a greater understanding of how telehealth impacts benefit limitations such as frequency and annual maxima for services, potentially influencing how dental plans are structured and offered to enrollees. Moreover, this information could assist policymakers and consumer advocates in assessing the reach and effectiveness of telehealth services in providing dental care.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1982, introduced by Assemblymember Santiago, focuses on the regulation of telehealth services specifically related to dental care in California. The bill mandates that health care service plans and insurers who provide dental services through telehealth report various metrics to the state, including the total number of telehealth services delivered and the demographic information of the patients receiving these services. This initiative aims to increase transparency about the use of telehealth in dental care and its implications for insurance coverage.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1982 is predominantly positive among proponents who argue that it will improve patient awareness and accessibility to dental services through telehealth. They believe the requirement for detailed reporting will enhance accountability and lead to better health outcomes. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders that increased regulatory burdens could deter dental care providers from offering telehealth services or increase administrative costs for health plans, which could be passed on to consumers.

Contention

Despite broad support, the bill has faced some contention regarding its potential impact on health care providers and insurers. Critics argue that while the intent is to enhance transparency, the complexities involved in complying with new reporting requirements may pose challenges, particularly for smaller providers. Additionally, there are worries that some nuances of telehealth services—like varying types of dental consultations—may not be adequately captured, leading to incomplete data that could misrepresent the effectiveness of these services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB457

Protection of Patient Choice in Telehealth Provider Act.

CA SB577

Insurance.

HI HB384

Relating To Telehealth.

HI SB3288

Relating To Telehealth.

HI HB1634

Relating To Telehealth.

LA HB530

Provides for coverage of healthcare services provided through telehealth or telemedicine (RE1 SEE FISC NOTE SG EX)

NJ A3699

Authorizes health care professionals to engage in the use of remote patient monitoring devices; requires health care insurance coverage by certain insurers for remote patient monitoring devices.

NJ S846

Revises requirements for health insurers to cover telemedicine and telehealth; requires telemedicine and telehealth systems to include accessible communication features for individuals with disabilities.