California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB199

Introduced
1/8/21  
Introduced
1/8/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Report Pass
2/18/21  
Report Pass
2/18/21  
Refer
2/22/21  
Engrossed
2/25/21  
Engrossed
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
6/26/22  
Report Pass
6/26/22  
Refer
6/26/22  
Refer
6/26/22  
Report Pass
6/27/22  
Report Pass
6/27/22  
Enrolled
6/29/22  
Chaptered
6/30/22  
Chaptered
6/30/22  
Passed
6/30/22  

Caption

Courts.

Impact

The bill fundamentally alters the way trial courts operate by changing the financial structures that support them. By limiting civil assessments and altering their allocation, AB199 aims to lighten the financial strain on defendants while ensuring that court operations remain funded through a more sustainable model. The bill also mandates the development of online tools for adjudicating infractions to streamline court processes, giving courts the capability to handle cases more efficiently and accessibly.

Summary

Assembly Bill 199 seeks to reform various aspects of California's court system, particularly in terms of funding and the imposition of civil assessments. The bill reduces the maximum civil assessment for missed court appearances from $300 to $100 and redirects these funds from the Trial Court Trust Fund to the General Fund. This modification aims to alleviate financial burdens on individuals who may struggle with fines and enhance access to justice, particularly for low-income residents.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB199 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents who view it as a significant step towards modernizing and improving the court system. Supporters argue that reducing the burden of civil assessments will help those most in need while addressing concerns about fairness in the judicial process. However, there is also some apprehension regarding the potential impacts on court funding and resources, as municipalities rely on these assessments to fund local judicial operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB199 include debates on the balance between fiscal responsibility and access to justice. Critics of the reduced civil assessments express concerns that decreased funding could harm court operations, potentially leading to reduced services or backlogs in processing cases. Supporters counter that innovative funding models and increased efficiency from online tools can offset these concerns, suggesting that the long-term benefits of improved access to justice outweigh the short-term challenges of transitional funding.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB199

Courts.

CA AB170

Courts.

CA SB170

Courts.

CA SB22

Crimes.

CA AB135

Public safety.

CA SB135

Public safety.

CA SB99

Law enforcement agencies: military equipment.

CA AB1214

Courts: remote technology.