California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2003

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
4/21/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/14/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Refer
6/27/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/24/22  
Vetoed
9/22/22  

Caption

California Workforce Development Board: model career pathways.

Impact

The bill’s impact on state law is to enhance workforce development by ensuring that essential workers are given opportunities for career advancement through clear pathways into high road jobs. It emphasizes accessible programs for individuals facing economic, physical, or other barriers to employment. The legislation also requires strategic partnerships with educational institutions and community organizations to align resources and provide relevant training, thus aiming to benefit local economies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2003, known as the Career Pathways for Essential Workers Act of 2022, is designed to create structured career pathways for essential workers in California. The bill mandates that the California Workforce Development Board develop model career pathways that build upon the skills of workers employed in essential occupations. It acknowledges the pivotal role these workers played during the COVID-19 pandemic in maintaining essential services while addressing significant barriers they face, such as low wages and limited access to education.

Sentiment

There is a generally positive sentiment surrounding AB 2003, reflecting a recognition of the contributions of essential workers and a proactive approach to their professional advancement. Proponents argue that by establishing these pathways, the bill not only compensates workers fairly but also helps elevate the economy as a whole. The acknowledgment of essential workers’ efforts during the pandemic resonates strongly in discussions about equity and opportunity in the labor market.

Contention

While AB 2003 has broad support, there are concerns about its effectiveness and the timelines set for implementation. Critics may argue that the measures for tracking progress and accountability may not be robust enough to ensure meaningful outcomes for workers. Additionally, some stakeholders may worry about the potential bureaucratic complexities that could arise from implementing these pathways effectively, particularly regarding collaboration among various state and local partners.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB21

Single-room occupancy units: demolition and replacement: housing assistance programs: eligibility for homeless individuals and families.

CA AB1303

School facilities: Civic Center Act: direct costs.

CA SB700

State Contract Act: High Road Employment Program.

CA AB2058

Career technical education: California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program: Strong Workforce Program.

CA SB1321

Employment Training Panel: employment training program: projects and proposals.

CA AB377

Career technical education: California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program: Strong Workforce Program.

CA AB290

Career technical education: California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program: Strong Workforce Program.

CA SB162

Community Economic Resilience Fund Program.