The bill mandates that the housing plan developed by the Department of Housing and Community Development includes specifics on the required number of affordable housing units within California. It aims to increase home ownership rates among people of color by at least 20% by the year 2028, which seeks to address historical inequities in home ownership rates. This proactive approach is designed to facilitate more equitable access to housing and help establish a framework for ongoing assessment of housing needs within the state.
Summary
AB2013, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva, aims to enhance home ownership opportunities for Californians, focusing particularly on marginalized communities, including people of color and millennials. The bill establishes the Legislative Task Force on the California Master Plan on Home Ownership, which will consist of 11 members tasked with addressing impediments to home ownership and making recommendations to improve access for all Californians. This initiative is set against a backdrop of existing laws that require the California Statewide Housing Plan to incorporate goals related to housing and home ownership every four years.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB2013 appears to be positive, particularly among community advocates and housing organizations that support increased participation in home ownership among historically marginalized groups. However, there may be some contention about the elements of the implementation and the effectiveness of the task force created under the bill, reflecting broader debates about how best to address housing affordability and access in California.
Contention
Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the adequacy and speed of the proposed interventions, with critics potentially questioning whether the legislative task force can effectively influence real change within the specified timeline. Moreover, there may be differing views on how to best achieve the goal of increasing home ownership among diverse populations, which could lead to discussions about the necessity and parameters of proposed reforms within the housing sector.