California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2031

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Engrossed
5/16/22  
Refer
5/17/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Chaptered
9/28/22  

Caption

Mobilehome Residency Law: management meetings with homeowners.

Impact

The impact of AB 2031 is expected to enhance the governance of mobilehome parks by establishing clearer obligations for park management. Homeowners will now have structured opportunities to voice their concerns and negotiate aspects concerning their living environment. This could lead to better maintenance of facilities and greater transparency around utility costs. Overall, the bill aims to ensure that management cannot ignore homeowner concerns and must facilitate regular consultations, thereby empowering residents in their communities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2031, also known as the Mobilehome Residency Law, aims to improve communication and collaboration between mobilehome park management and homeowners. The bill specifies the matters on which management must meet with homeowners, expanding current provisions to include discussions about utility billing, common area facilities, and maintenance standards, among others. With this legislation, management is required to respond to written requests from homeowners within 30 days. The participation methods for these meetings have also been broadened to allow for virtual attendance, catering to the modern needs of residents who may not be able to attend in person.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2031 appears to be positive among advocates for homeowners' rights, promoting greater participation and oversight within mobilehome communities. Proponents argue that the bill will foster better relations between management and residents, allowing for collective negotiation on key issues. However, as with many legislative reforms, there may be concerns from management sides regarding the logistics and feasibility of implementing these expanded requirements, particularly regarding virtual meeting setups and compliance costs.

Contention

Discussions about the bill highlighted potential points of contention, especially around the practicality of virtual meetings and the need for management to accommodate language interpreters as mandated by the bill. Some critics argue that these requirements may create additional burdens on park management, complicating operational aspects of mobilehome community governance. Furthermore, the obligation to hold consultations on broader topics could lead to an increased number of disputes between homeowners and park management if not managed properly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI HB1980

Relating To Telephonic Services.

HI SB2645

Relating To Access To Behavioral Health Services.

HI HB1708

Relating To Access To Behavioral Health Services.

HI HB907

Relating To Telehealth.

HI HB2057

Relating To Telehealth.

HI SB2073

Relating To Telehealth.

HI HB384

Relating To Telehealth.

HI SB1258

Relating To Telehealth.