California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2060

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Refer
4/21/22  

Caption

Medical Board of California.

Impact

The proposed adjustments in AB2060 are significant as they influence the board's composition, aiming for a more balanced representation between licensed professionals and public citizens. The bill also proposes that board members must be residents of California for five years before their appointment, which aligns with the objective to ensure that board members have a vested interest in the state's healthcare landscape. Additionally, the requirement for physician members to hold faculty appointments is reduced from four to three, which may affect the board's connection to academic medicine in the state.

Summary

AB2060, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk, aims to amend the Medical Practice Act concerning the structure and composition of the Medical Board of California. The bill seeks to increase the number of public members on the board from seven to eight. Furthermore, it mandates that the first vacancy occurring in a physician and surgeon position after January 1, 2023, shall convert to a public member position. This change is indicative of an effort to enhance public representation within the regulatory framework governing physicians and surgeons in the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB2060 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for increased public participation in medical regulation. Proponents argue that adding more public members allows for greater accountability and transparency in the decision-making processes of the Medical Board. However, there may be concerns from some members of the medical community regarding the dilution of professional representation on the board, as having fewer physician members with faculty appointments might limit the board's ability to address complex medical issues effectively.

Contention

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions about the balance of power between medical professionals and the public in healthcare governance. Critics argue that this shift may introduce biases in regulatory decisions that could favor public sentiment over established medical practices. Furthermore, the immediate future of the board's composition will be closely scrutinized, as the new changes will expire one year after their implementation unless further action is taken by the legislature to either extend or revise them.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2688

Medical Board of California: appointments: removal.

CA AB1257

Dentistry: Dental Hygiene Board of California: Dental hygienists: Examinations and licensure.

CA AB3279

State Bar of California.

CA SB1436

California Tax Policy Oversight Board.

CA SB815

Healing arts.

CA AB1505

California Earthquake Authority: closed meetings.

CA AB3081

Public postsecondary education: University of California, Merced: medical education.

CA AB999

CaliforniaVolunteers: Board of Commissioners.

CA AB389

Native American repatriation: California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 2001: California State University.

CA SB40

State Bar of California.

Similar Bills

CA SB487

Practice of medicine: hospitals.

CA AB1954

Physicians and surgeons: treatment and medication of patients using cannabis.

CA SB1237

Nurse-midwives: scope of practice.

CA SB909

Steven M. Thompson Physician Corps Loan Repayment Program.

CA AB796

Athletic trainers.

CA AB2194

Physician assistants: supervision: doctors of podiatric medicine.

CA AB1510

Athletic trainers.

CA SB697

Physician assistants: practice agreement: supervision.