Fire protection districts: electrical corporations and local publicly owned electric utilities: wildfire mitigation: notice requirements.
By imposing these notification requirements, AB 2070 seeks to improve communication and coordination between utility companies and fire protection districts, potentially reducing the risk of electrical activities leading to wildfires. The bill also introduces a civil penalty of $500 for corporations that fail to notify districts as required, and stipulates that such costs cannot be passed on to consumers, thereby holding shareholders accountable for violations. This change in fiscal liability aims to ensure responsible corporate behavior in managing fire hazards.
Assembly Bill 2070, introduced by Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan, aims to enhance wildfire mitigation efforts related to electrical infrastructure. The bill modifies existing regulations under the Public Utilities Code, laying down new notice requirements for electrical corporations and local publicly owned electric utilities concerning specific activities in high fire risk areas. It mandates that these entities provide a minimum of 24 hours notice to fire protection districts before conducting scheduled nonemergency hot work, deploying safety and infrastructure protection teams, or performing prescribed burns in designated zones, which are identified as having high, very high, or extreme fire threats.
Overall sentiment around AB 2070 appears to be supportive among those focused on improving public safety and reducing wildfire risks. Proponents advocate that the advance notice structure will empower local fire agencies to prepare adequately for potential hazards linked to electrical infrastructure operations. However, concerns may arise regarding the implications for businesses and operational efficiency, particularly for utility companies managing urgent repair situations where notice may not be feasible. Debate likely centers around finding the right balance between proactive safety measures and necessary operational flexibility.
Notable points of contention might include the mechanics of implementing such notification systems and how effectively they can be integrated into existing operational practices of electrical corporations. Critics may argue about the feasibility of the 24-hour notice requirement during unforeseen emergencies, while supporters may emphasize the importance of preemptive communication in safeguarding communities from wildfire threats. Furthermore, the bill's framing of penalties could also provoke discussions highlighting the responsibilities of utility companies in ensuring compliance.