California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2089

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Report Pass
8/1/22  
Report Pass
8/1/22  
Refer
8/1/22  
Refer
8/1/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Chaptered
9/28/22  
Passed
9/28/22  

Caption

Privacy: mental health digital services: mental health application information.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by extending the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) to encompass mental health application information. It mandates that any business providing mental health digital services must adhere to specific privacy requirements equivalent to those of healthcare providers. This move is expected to bolster consumer protections regarding sensitive health data, especially in a landscape where technology increasingly mediates healthcare delivery.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2089, approved on September 28, 2022, aims to enhance privacy protections relating to mental health digital services in California. It amends existing laws to redefine 'medical information' to include data collected by applications and services specifically offered for mental health purposes. This change recognizes the growing intersection of mental health care and technology, ensuring that digital tools catering to mental health are held to the same privacy standards as traditional health care providers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2089 appears generally positive, particularly among advocates for mental health privacy rights. Supporters argue that incorporating digital mental health services into existing privacy frameworks is a progressive step towards safeguarding patient information in the digital age. However, there may be some concerns regarding how these regulations will be implemented, particularly for smaller businesses operating in this space.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential costs for businesses that need to comply with new privacy standards, as well as the implications for innovation in mental health technology. Critics could argue that stringent regulations might hinder startups or small enterprises that offer mental health services through digital platforms, even as proponents assert that such regulations are essential for protecting sensitive patient information.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB254

Confidentiality of Medical Information Act: reproductive or sexual health application information.

CA AB1252

Information privacy: digital health feedback systems.

CA AB2280

Information privacy: personal health record information: software or hardware.

CA AB1436

Information privacy: digital health feedback systems.

CA AB384

Information privacy: digital health feedback systems.

CA AB2167

Information privacy: digital health feedback systems.

CA AB1697

Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.