Alternative workweek schedule: election results: reporting.
The bill essentially expands the existing criminal framework by increasing the frequency of reporting requirements, which may lead to penalties for non-compliance within a tighter timeframe. This state-mandated reporting change will not require additional reimbursement by the state to local agencies or school districts since it is classified under mandates for which costs may be incurred due to the creation of new infractions.
AB2110, introduced by Assembly Member Flora, is an amendment to Section 511 of the California Labor Code, concerning alternative workweek schedules. The bill modifies the current requirement for employers to report the results of secret ballot elections held to adopt an alternative workweek schedule from 30 days to just 15 days. This change aims to streamline compliance and facilitate quicker acknowledgments of such scheduling changes, allowing for flexibility in working arrangements for employees.
The bill also clarifies various aspects of how alternative workweek schedules are structured, stipulating that the proposal can be a fixed or flexible schedule adopted by a two-thirds majority of employees in a defined work unit. It preserves the existing framework that mandates overtime compensation for hours worked over a standard 40-hour week or more than 10 hours in a day, ensuring that employee pay remains protected regardless of changes in scheduling.
One point of contention regarding AB2110 includes concerns from labor rights advocates about the potential hastening effect on workplace policies without providing enough time for employees to comprehend and respond to changes in their working conditions. Critics argue that the reduction in reporting time could lead to issues with transparency and employee awareness. Furthermore, supporters emphasize that this provision streamlines operations for employers, reducing bureaucracy and inefficiencies that could hinder the workforce.