California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2237

Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Refer
4/26/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Refer
6/16/22  

Caption

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

Impact

AB 2237 aims to reform how transportation projects are planned and funded throughout the state. The bill mandates that all projects within regional transportation plans align with the most current sustainable communities strategy and state climate goals. Additionally, it prohibits the expenditure of funds collected from local tax measures unless they are part of an adopted strategy, effectively tying local funding to state-wide goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable growth.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2237, introduced by Assembly Member Friedman, aims to enhance transportation planning in California by ensuring alignment between local transportation projects and sustainable community strategies. The bill requires that any project funded by local tax measures passed after January 1, 2023, must first be included in a sustainable communities strategy adopted by the applicable regional transportation agency. This ensures that local projects contribute to the state's climate goals and do not increase emissions of greenhouse gases from vehicles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2237 appears to be largely supportive among environmental advocates and some planning agencies, who view the bill as a necessary step toward sustainable urban development and climate action. However, there may be some contention from local governments and transportation agencies concerned about the constraints imposed by the bill, which could limit their immediate project funding flexibility and decision-making autonomy.

Contention

Critics of the bill may argue that the requirements could delay important transportation projects and invoke a level of dependency on state-defined sustainable strategies, which could be perceived as an overreach. They may claim that it undermines local governance by placing state-level mandates on local agencies' planning processes. The requirement that projects must prioritize alignment with sustainability strategies could result in challenges for local authorities in managing their own transportation planning agendas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB526

Regional transportation plans: greenhouse gas emissions: State Mobility Action Plan for Healthy Communities.

CA AB1335

Local government: transportation planning and land use: sustainable communities strategy.

CA AB6

Transportation planning: regional transportation plans: reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

CA AB350

Regional transportation plans: Sacramento Area Council of Governments.

CA AB1147

Regional transportation plan: Active Transportation Program.

CA AB2262

Greenhouse gases: zero-emission vehicle charging or fueling infrastructure: statewide assessment and zero-emission readiness plans.

CA SB475

Transportation planning: sustainable communities strategies.