California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2278

Introduced
2/16/22  
Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Refer
4/26/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Refer
8/2/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Chaptered
9/16/22  

Caption

Natural resources: biodiversity and conservation report.

Impact

AB 2278 significantly impacts California's environmental policy framework by embedding a specific conservation objective into state law. With its focus on the 30x30 goal, the bill aims to align efforts between local, state, and federal agencies and encourages collaboration among various stakeholders. A key feature of the bill is the emphasis on public outreach, particularly towards marginalized communities, thereby promoting equitable access to natural resources and addressing historical inequities in land use and conservation.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2278 requires the Natural Resources Agency to actively pursue the goal of conserving at least 30% of California's lands and coastal waters by 2030, as mandated by Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-82-20. This legislative measure establishes a structured approach to initiating significant actions towards this conservation goal while addressing the ongoing biodiversity and climate crises that threaten California's ecology. By mandating annual reports to the Legislature starting in 2024, the bill aims to enhance accountability and ensure that progress is documented and assessed over time.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2278 appears supportive among environmentalists and advocates for sustainable practices, who view it as a pivotal step in combating climate change and preserving biodiversity. However, there may be concerns from stakeholders worried about the implications of increased regulation or those who argue about the need for more comprehensive community engagement strategies. Overall, the proponents are optimistic about the bill's potential to create a more sustainable ecological future for California.

Contention

A notable point of contention could arise from the necessity of balancing conservation efforts with the economic interests of landowners and businesses. The enforcement of the 30x30 target could lead to restrictions on land use, prompting discussions over property rights versus collective environmental responsibility. Additionally, challenges may surface in effectively engaging tribal groups and historically marginalized communities to ensure their representation in conservation planning and resource management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2440

30x30 goal: partnering state agencies: Department of Parks and Recreation.

CA AB2320

Wildlife Connectivity and Climate Adaptation Act of 2024: wildlife corridors: fish passage.

CA SB337

Environmental protection: lands and coastal waters conservation goal.

CA AB3023

Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force: interagency funding strategy: multiple benefit projects: grant program guidelines.

CA AB2371

Climate change: Office of Planning and Research: science advisory team: climate adaptation and hazard mitigation.

CA AB2285

Natural resources: equitable outdoor access: 30x30 goal: urban nature-based projects.

CA AB2649

Natural Carbon Sequestration and Resilience Act of 2022.

CA AB1042

The Cannella Environmental Farming Act of 1995: Managed Honeybee Health Program.