California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2380

Introduced
2/17/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Report Pass
4/5/22  
Report Pass
4/5/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Engrossed
5/12/22  
Engrossed
5/12/22  
Refer
5/12/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Refer
8/24/22  
Refer
8/24/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Chaptered
9/26/22  
Chaptered
9/26/22  
Passed
9/26/22  

Caption

Online pet retailers: retail financing options.

Impact

By enforcing this restriction, AB 2380 aims to ensure that consumers engage in informed and responsible adoptions or purchases of pets without the pressures or complications of financial agreements. The bill complements existing laws under the Lockyer-Polanco-Farr Pet Protection Act, which requires dealers to adhere to certain health and safety standards and ensures consumers receive information regarding their rights and available remedies concerning pet transactions. The bill also reinforces penalties for violations concerning consumer rights and animal health.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2380, introduced by Maienschein, is a legislative measure that adds Section 122191 to the Health and Safety Code, focusing on regulations concerning online pet retailers. The bill establishes a prohibition against online pet retailers from offering or facilitating loans or other financing options for the adoption or sale of dogs, cats, or rabbits. The intent behind this legislation is to enhance consumer protection and animal welfare by preventing potential abuses that could arise from financing options related to pet sales.

Sentiment

Discussions around AB 2380 have been largely supportive among animal welfare advocates and consumer protection groups, emphasizing the importance of ethical treatment and responsible sales practices for pets. Legislators recognized the potential dangers of poor financing practices that might exploit vulnerable consumers. Some opposition may have emerged from segments of the retail industry concerned about the impact of financial restrictions on market dynamics, but the overall sentiment has leaned towards strengthening protections for both animals and consumers.

Contention

One notable point of contention in the passage of AB 2380 was the balance between consumer access to financing and the ethical implications of that financing in the context of pet adoptions. Critics of unfettered financing options argue that they could lead to hasty and irresponsible pet ownership, while proponents of the bill suggest that any financing related to pets should be approached with caution and prioritization of animal welfare and consumer protection.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB650

Alcoholic beverage licensees: events: sponsorship and participation.

LA HB594

Establishes a flat rate of insurance premium tax and provides relative to certain insurance premium tax credits and exemptions (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF RV)

OK HB2766

General appropriations; various agencies, authorities, boards, bureaus, commission, funds and programs; effective date.

CA AB2579

Inspections: exterior elevated elements.

OK HB1004

General appropriations; effective date.

OK SB1125

General appropriations; making appropriations to various agencies. Effective date.

OK HB2900

Appropriations and budget; general approprations; effective date.

CA AB1645

Hydrogen fluoride: report.