California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2556

Introduced
2/17/22  
Introduced
2/17/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/30/22  
Report Pass
3/30/22  
Refer
3/30/22  
Refer
3/30/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Engrossed
5/9/22  
Engrossed
5/9/22  
Refer
5/10/22  
Refer
5/10/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Chaptered
9/18/22  
Chaptered
9/18/22  
Passed
9/18/22  

Caption

Local public employee organizations.

Impact

This legislation modifies existing laws under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, which regulates collective bargaining among local represented employees. It reflects a shift in the balance of power between public employees and their organizations by allowing for fees for representation in specific circumstances. By introducing these changes, AB 2556 may influence the nature of public employment relations and the financial responsibilities tied to discipline or grievance proceedings, as negotiated between employees and their representatives.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2556, known as the Local Public Employee Organizations Act, aims to amend specific sections of the Government Code to enhance the rights of public employees regarding their dealings with recognized employee organizations. Primarily, the bill allows these organizations to charge employees who decline membership or have conscientious objections for the reasonable cost of individual representation in various proceedings. This change particularly targets those employees covered by the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act, emphasizing individual rights within the broader framework of employee organization engagement.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 2556 appears mixed among the various stakeholders involved. Supporters argue that it empowers employee organizations to sustain their operations by providing a means to cover representation costs, thus potentially enhancing the quality of support available to workers. Critics, however, may see this as an unfair burden on employees who do not wish to join or financially support these organizations, suggesting it may coerce engagement in unions contrary to personal beliefs or preferences.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention revolves around the potential for financial strain on employees who might require representation but are reluctant to join an employee organization. There are concerns that allowing charges for representation could act as a disincentive for employees to refuse membership, thereby undermining existing rights that protect employees from being compelled to join and support organizations against their will. Furthermore, the bill requires an adjustment in how public agencies handle mediation and negotiation processes, affecting the timeline and procedural controls associated with labor-related disputes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2433

Local public employee organizations.

CA AB283

In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act.

CA AB1032

Courts: court interpreters.

CA SB493

Education: sex equity.

NJ S292

Provides super conciliation for certain emergency responder service employees, and requires continuation of contract provisions during negotiations.

NJ S996

Provides super conciliation for certain emergency responder service employees, and requires continuation of contract provisions during negotiations.

CA AB1941

Local public employee organizations.

CA AB130

Health and human services.