California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2696

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Refer
6/21/22  
Refer
6/21/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
8/2/22  

Caption

Electricity: transmission facilities: study.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2696 would facilitate a state-led assessment that could lead to significant changes in how transmission facilities are funded and operated in California. By focusing on alternative financing mechanisms, the study aims to uncover opportunities for cost reduction, potentially allowing for more resilient and accessible energy transmission. This shift could affect existing laws related to energy generation and distribution, ensuring that California aligns better with its climate objectives and energy needs.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2696, authored by Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia, seeks to enhance California's approach to electricity transmission by mandating a comprehensive study on potential ownership and financing mechanisms for new transmission facilities. This initiative is part of the state's broader goal to meet clean energy and climate targets. The bill calls for the California Energy Commission, in collaboration with several key state agencies, to explore lower-cost alternatives, including public ownership and partnerships with federal entities, thereby potentially reshaping the future of energy infrastructure in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiments regarding AB 2696 reflect a sense of optimism among environmental advocates and stakeholders within the renewable energy sector. Supporters believe that this bill underscores a proactive approach to resolving existing infrastructure challenges and advancing clean energy initiatives. However, it may also face scrutiny from those concerned about the implications of public ownership and the involvement of federal entities in critical state infrastructure efforts, highlighting a nuanced debate around public versus private management of energy resources.

Contention

The primary points of contention surrounding AB 2696 involve the potential impact on current practices in energy financing and ownership structures. Critics may argue that increased public ownership could stifle competition and innovation within the private sector, while proponents emphasize the necessity of public involvement to meet urgent climate goals. The outcomes of the mandated study, as delineated by the bill, will be crucial in addressing these concerns and shaping the future landscape of California's energy policies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB330

Electrical transmission infrastructure: financing.

CA SB1032

State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: electrical transmission grid development and expansion: study.

CA AB825

Energy: electricity.

CA AB3264

Energy: cost framework: residential rates: demand-side management programs report: electrical transmission grid study.

CA SB332

Investor-Owned Utilities Accountability Act.

CA AB2661

Electricity: Westlands Water District.

CA AB1561

Economic development: infrastructure: logistic hubs.