California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2749

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Refer
4/28/22  
Refer
4/28/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Refer
8/1/22  
Refer
8/1/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Vetoed
9/29/22  

Caption

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund.

Impact

The bill aims to expand the reach of reliable broadband services to no less than 98 percent of California households by the end of 2032, thus promoting economic development and job creation through enhanced communication technologies. It mandates the Public Utilities Commission to adopt affordability requirements for grant recipients, ensuring that these funds are used effectively to improve access for low-income and historically underserved populations. This approach aligns with the state's goals for digital inclusion and economic equity.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2749, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva, amends Section 281 of the Public Utilities Code regarding communications and the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF). The primary objective of the bill is to enhance the deployment of high-quality advanced communications services, particularly targeting both urban and rural underserved communities. It authorizes eligible wireless broadband service providers to receive funding from both the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account and the Federal Funding Account, facilitating improvements in broadband infrastructure necessary for equitable internet access across California.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2749 is positive among supporters, who view it as a step towards bridging the digital divide in California. However, there are concerns raised about the potential limitations on local authority and the exact mechanisms through which the funds will be distributed. Advocates emphasize the importance of supporting efforts in communities that have historically faced barriers to broadband access, suggesting a broad consensus on the bill's vision but a need for careful implementation.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include potential bureaucratic hurdles associated with the grant application process, and skepticism regarding the effectiveness of the State's previous efforts in internet access initiatives. Opponents of the bill may argue that without sufficient oversight, funds could be misallocated or fail to reach the communities that need them most. The bill's urgency clause reflects a recognition of the immediate need for action, emphasizing its importance amid ongoing discussions about equity in technology access.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1065

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund.

CA AB1426

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Adoption Account.

CA SB1383

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Public Housing Account.

CA AB1461

California Advanced Services Fund: Federal Funding Account.

CA AB1349

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Adoption Account.

CA SB4

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund.

CA AB2702

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Public Housing Account.