California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2789

Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Refer
4/28/22  
Report Pass
5/18/22  
Report Pass
5/18/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Report Pass
6/30/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Enrolled
8/8/22  
Enrolled
8/8/22  
Chaptered
8/29/22  
Chaptered
8/29/22  
Passed
8/29/22  

Caption

Design-build projects: local agencies.

Impact

The impact of AB 2789 is significant as it modifies and expands the authorized uses for the design-build process. This includes the construction, restoration, and improvement of various facilities and public access areas, potentially resulting in more efficient management of public resources. Furthermore, it extends an exemption from the $1 million project threshold previously applicable to certain local agencies, allowing them to procure contracts without such financial limitations, thus providing flexibility for larger projects.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2789, introduced by Assemblymember Mullin, aims to amend certain sections of the Public Resources Code pertaining to design-build contracting processes for local agencies such as the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, the East Bay Regional Park District, and the Santa Clara Valley Open-Space Authority. This bill seeks to repeal a sunset provision, thereby extending these entities' ability to use the design-build method for public works projects indefinitely. The design-build process allows entities to streamline the procurement process for construction services, which proponents argue can lead to increased efficiency and cost savings in project execution.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 2789 appears to be supportive among stakeholders involved in public works and environmental restoration, as it incentivizes the use of a modern contracting approach that can lead to better project outcomes. However, there may be concerns regarding oversight and transparency in the procurement process with the expanded powers afforded to local agencies, revealing a potential divide between efficiency supporters and those advocating for stringent regulations.

Contention

Key points of contention include the implications of expanding design-build authority, especially regarding local governance and accountability. Opponents may argue that such measures could dilute the public oversight usually exercised in traditional bidding processes, potentially increasing risks of inefficiency or mismanagement in public contracting. The bill also inadvertently expands perjury offenses associated with the certification of information for design-build entities, introducing legal considerations that may concern some stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB793

Competitive bidding: design-build and best value construction contracting.

CA AB2137

Regional park and open-space districts: general manager: powers.

CA AB769

Regional park and open-space districts.

CA SB492

Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District: purchase of property: San Jose Water Company.

CA SB119

Budget Act of 2021.

CA AB169

Budget Act of 2021.

CA SB1414

Timber harvesting plans: San Jose Water Company.