California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2808 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 2808Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnellFebruary 18, 2022 An act to add Section 18 to the Elections Code, relating to elections. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 2808, as introduced, ODonnell. Elections: ranked choice voting.Existing law specifies various procedures for conducting statewide and local elections.This bill would prohibit the use of ranked choice voting, a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, in state and local elections.The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Ranked choice voting can lead to inherently undemocratic outcomes like the winners of elections failing to receive a plurality of the vote.(b) Ranked choice voting is fundamentally more complicated than currently available alternatives and this complexity can lead to mistakes that can further disenfranchise voters.(c) Ranked choice voting can lead to elections that are more expensive given the additional computer systems or manpower required to tabulate the ranked votes.(d) Many of the purported benefits of ranked choice voting, including more diverse fields of candidates and fewer negative campaign advertisements, have not been realized in the jurisdictions that have used this election method.(e) Ranked choice voting does not lead to outcomes that reflect the ideals of our democracy and could harm the ability of voters to express their vote.SEC. 2. Section 18 is added to the Elections Code, to read:18. (a) State and local elections shall not be conducted using ranked choice voting.(b) For purposes of this section, ranked choice voting means a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates for office in order of preference.SEC. 3. The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this act addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Section 2 of this act applies to all cities, including charter cities.
2	2
3	3	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 2808Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnellFebruary 18, 2022 An act to add Section 18 to the Elections Code, relating to elections. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 2808, as introduced, ODonnell. Elections: ranked choice voting.Existing law specifies various procedures for conducting statewide and local elections.This bill would prohibit the use of ranked choice voting, a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, in state and local elections.The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION
10	10
11	11	Assembly Bill
12	12
13	13	No. 2808
14	14
15	15	Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnellFebruary 18, 2022
16	16
17	17	Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnell
18	18	February 18, 2022
19	19
20	20	An act to add Section 18 to the Elections Code, relating to elections.
21	21
22	22	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
23	23
24	24	## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
25	25
26	26	AB 2808, as introduced, ODonnell. Elections: ranked choice voting.
27	27
28	28	Existing law specifies various procedures for conducting statewide and local elections.This bill would prohibit the use of ranked choice voting, a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, in state and local elections.The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
29	29
30	30	Existing law specifies various procedures for conducting statewide and local elections.
31	31
32	32	This bill would prohibit the use of ranked choice voting, a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, in state and local elections.
33	33
34	34	The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
35	35
36	36	## Digest Key
37	37
38	38	## Bill Text
39	39
40	40	The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Ranked choice voting can lead to inherently undemocratic outcomes like the winners of elections failing to receive a plurality of the vote.(b) Ranked choice voting is fundamentally more complicated than currently available alternatives and this complexity can lead to mistakes that can further disenfranchise voters.(c) Ranked choice voting can lead to elections that are more expensive given the additional computer systems or manpower required to tabulate the ranked votes.(d) Many of the purported benefits of ranked choice voting, including more diverse fields of candidates and fewer negative campaign advertisements, have not been realized in the jurisdictions that have used this election method.(e) Ranked choice voting does not lead to outcomes that reflect the ideals of our democracy and could harm the ability of voters to express their vote.SEC. 2. Section 18 is added to the Elections Code, to read:18. (a) State and local elections shall not be conducted using ranked choice voting.(b) For purposes of this section, ranked choice voting means a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates for office in order of preference.SEC. 3. The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this act addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Section 2 of this act applies to all cities, including charter cities.
41	41
42	42	The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
43	43
44	44	## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
45	45
46	46	SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Ranked choice voting can lead to inherently undemocratic outcomes like the winners of elections failing to receive a plurality of the vote.(b) Ranked choice voting is fundamentally more complicated than currently available alternatives and this complexity can lead to mistakes that can further disenfranchise voters.(c) Ranked choice voting can lead to elections that are more expensive given the additional computer systems or manpower required to tabulate the ranked votes.(d) Many of the purported benefits of ranked choice voting, including more diverse fields of candidates and fewer negative campaign advertisements, have not been realized in the jurisdictions that have used this election method.(e) Ranked choice voting does not lead to outcomes that reflect the ideals of our democracy and could harm the ability of voters to express their vote.
47	47
48	48	SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Ranked choice voting can lead to inherently undemocratic outcomes like the winners of elections failing to receive a plurality of the vote.(b) Ranked choice voting is fundamentally more complicated than currently available alternatives and this complexity can lead to mistakes that can further disenfranchise voters.(c) Ranked choice voting can lead to elections that are more expensive given the additional computer systems or manpower required to tabulate the ranked votes.(d) Many of the purported benefits of ranked choice voting, including more diverse fields of candidates and fewer negative campaign advertisements, have not been realized in the jurisdictions that have used this election method.(e) Ranked choice voting does not lead to outcomes that reflect the ideals of our democracy and could harm the ability of voters to express their vote.
49	49
50	50	SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
51	51
52	52	### SECTION 1.
53	53
54	54	(a) Ranked choice voting can lead to inherently undemocratic outcomes like the winners of elections failing to receive a plurality of the vote.
55	55
56	56	(b) Ranked choice voting is fundamentally more complicated than currently available alternatives and this complexity can lead to mistakes that can further disenfranchise voters.
57	57
58	58	(c) Ranked choice voting can lead to elections that are more expensive given the additional computer systems or manpower required to tabulate the ranked votes.
59	59
60	60	(d) Many of the purported benefits of ranked choice voting, including more diverse fields of candidates and fewer negative campaign advertisements, have not been realized in the jurisdictions that have used this election method.
61	61
62	62	(e) Ranked choice voting does not lead to outcomes that reflect the ideals of our democracy and could harm the ability of voters to express their vote.
63	63
64	64	SEC. 2. Section 18 is added to the Elections Code, to read:18. (a) State and local elections shall not be conducted using ranked choice voting.(b) For purposes of this section, ranked choice voting means a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates for office in order of preference.
65	65
66	66	SEC. 2. Section 18 is added to the Elections Code, to read:
67	67
68	68	### SEC. 2.
69	69
70	70	18. (a) State and local elections shall not be conducted using ranked choice voting.(b) For purposes of this section, ranked choice voting means a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates for office in order of preference.
71	71
72	72	18. (a) State and local elections shall not be conducted using ranked choice voting.(b) For purposes of this section, ranked choice voting means a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates for office in order of preference.
73	73
74	74	18. (a) State and local elections shall not be conducted using ranked choice voting.(b) For purposes of this section, ranked choice voting means a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates for office in order of preference.
75	75
76	76
77	77
78	78	18. (a) State and local elections shall not be conducted using ranked choice voting.
79	79
80	80	(b) For purposes of this section, ranked choice voting means a method of voting that allows voters to rank candidates for office in order of preference.
81	81
82	82	SEC. 3. The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this act addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Section 2 of this act applies to all cities, including charter cities.
83	83
84	84	SEC. 3. The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this act addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Section 2 of this act applies to all cities, including charter cities.
85	85
86	86	SEC. 3. The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this act addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Section 2 of this act applies to all cities, including charter cities.
87	87
88	88	### SEC. 3.