California Assembly Bill AB3

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/7/20
• Refer: 1/11/21
• Report Pass: 3/15/21
• Refer: 3/16/21
• Report Pass: 3/23/21
• Refer: 3/23/21
• Report Pass: 4/14/21
• Engrossed: 4/22/21
• Refer: 4/26/21
• Refer: 5/12/21
• Report Pass: 6/15/21
• Refer: 6/16/21
• Report Pass: 7/14/21
• Refer: 7/15/21
• Report Pass: 8/16/21
• Refer: 8/16/21
• Refer: 8/23/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/8/21
• Chaptered: 10/7/21
• Passed: 10/7/21

Caption

Exhibition of speed on a highway: punishment.

Impact

The implications of AB3 will modify existing vehicle code provisions, adding a layer of accountability for those convicted of engaging in speed exhibitions. Courts are required to consider individual hardships when determining whether to suspend or restrict a driver's license, which might provide some leniency in the enforcement of penalties. Nonetheless, it reflects a stricter approach to controlling dangerous driving behaviors, potentially enhancing road safety across California.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 3, known as the Louis Friend Memorial Act, aims to address the issue of motor vehicle exhibitions of speed on highways by proposing stricter penalties for such offenses. Currently, engaging in or aiding an exhibition of speed can result in a misdemeanor charge, punishable by a brief period of imprisonment or a fine. However, as of July 1, 2025, this bill allows judges to suspend a driver's license for a duration ranging from 90 days to six months and impose restrictions on driving for employment purposes, indicating a move towards more severe consequences for this behavior.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB3 appears to be generally supportive, especially among those advocating for increased road safety measures. Proponents argue that the legislation provides necessary tools for judges to impose appropriate penalties that reflect the severity of these types of offenses. Conversely, some may view the license suspension provisions as overly punitive, raising concerns about the impact on individuals reliant on driving for their livelihoods.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the balance between enforcing strict penalties and ensuring that the repercussions do not unfairly affect individuals facing genuine hardships. The bill's requirement for courts to assess these hardships signifies an acknowledgment of the potential consequences on employment and daily life. As such, discussions surrounding AB3 are likely to involve debates over the adequacy of the judicial discretion outlined in the bill and the effectiveness of its measures in curbing dangerous driving behavior.