Shared mobility devices: insurance and tracking.
The impact of AB 371 is profound on existing state laws as it requires shared mobility service providers to adjust their insurance policies to include specific protections for third-party injuries and property damage. Starting July 1, 2023, individuals using shared mobility devices must have a minimum of $10,000 in liability coverage for pedestrian injuries and $1,000 for damage to assistive technology. By mandating these changes, the bill aims to foster a safer environment in urban areas where these devices are commonly used, while also ensuring that insurance policies cover the growing use of human-powered and electric bicycles.
Assembly Bill 371, known as the Shared Mobility Devices: Insurance and Tracking Bill, aims to enhance the safety and liability coverage associated with the use of shared mobility devices, such as electric scooters and bicycles. The bill outlines requirements for shared mobility service providers to maintain specific insurance coverage for users. This includes mandating coverage for bodily injury or death suffered by pedestrians when an incident involves negligent conduct by the user of the shared mobility device, thus holding providers and users accountable for their actions.
The sentiment regarding AB 371 is largely positive among safety advocates and urban planners who view the bill as a necessary step toward protecting pedestrians and improving accountability in the shared mobility sector. However, there is some concern from mobility providers about the financial implications of increased insurance costs and the administrative burden accompanying the new requirements. Overall, the discussions around this bill reflect a balance between promoting innovative transportation solutions and ensuring public safety.
Notable points of contention surrounding AB 371 include concerns regarding the potential for increased insurance premiums impacting the affordability and accessibility of shared mobility services. Some opponents argue that the bill may overly burden providers, deterring them from entering or remaining in the market. Another aspect of contention is the requirement for clear Braille signage on shared devices for reporting negligent activities, which some believe could complicate compliance especially for smaller operators. The bill's enactment results from a broader dialogue about urban mobility policy and the need for harmonized regulations that can adapt to technological advancements in transportation.