California Assembly Bill AB379

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/12/21
• Report Pass: 4/12/21
• Refer: 4/12/21
• Report Pass: 4/28/21
• Engrossed: 5/10/21
• Refer: 5/11/21
• Refer: 5/19/21
• Report Pass: 7/15/21
• Refer: 7/15/21
• Refer: 8/23/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/9/21
• Chaptered: 10/8/21
• Passed: 10/8/21

Caption

Wildlife conservation.

Impact

By including California Native American tribes in the agreement process, AB379 acknowledges the significant role these communities play in wildlife conservation. The department, with board approval, can collaborate with these tribes on projects that aim to enhance, manage, or restore fish and wildlife habitats. This inclusion may result in a broader range of habitat restoration programs, effectively utilizing traditional ecological knowledge and practices held by tribes. Such collaboration could lead to a more holistic approach to conservation efforts across the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 379, introduced by Gallagher, amends Section 1350 of the Fish and Game Code to enhance wildlife conservation efforts in California. This bill expands the existing framework established by the Wildlife Conservation Law of 1947, which already empowers the Wildlife Conservation Board to manage resources for wildlife habitats. The amendment specifically allows the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to enter into agreements with California Native American tribes and provides the board with the authority to grant loans or funding to these tribes for wildlife-related projects.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB379 is largely supportive, with advocates emphasizing the importance of inclusive conservation strategies that leverage local knowledge and expertise. Supporters argue that by fostering relationships with California Native American tribes, the state can create more effective and culturally sensitive wildlife preservation initiatives. Critics, though fewer, might raise concerns about the adequacy of oversight and the allocation of funds, although specific dissenting voices were not extensively noted in the available discussions.

Contention

While the bill appears to be a positive step towards more inclusive wildlife conservation efforts, potential points of contention could arise regarding the distribution of grants and the management of collaborative projects. Ensuring that the funding and responsibilities are allocated fairly and transparently among all parties will be crucial for maintaining trust and efficacy in these new agreements. This amendment could challenge existing bureaucratic protocols, necessitating careful management to prevent conflicts or mismanagement in the future.