California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB559

Introduced
2/11/21  
Introduced
2/11/21  
Refer
2/18/21  
Refer
2/18/21  
Report Pass
3/17/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Refer
3/25/21  
Refer
3/25/21  
Report Pass
4/15/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Report Pass
7/8/21  
Report Pass
7/8/21  
Refer
7/12/21  
Refer
8/23/21  
Refer
8/23/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Enrolled
9/2/21  
Enrolled
9/2/21  
Chaptered
9/16/21  
Chaptered
9/16/21  
Passed
9/16/21  

Caption

San Joaquin River Conservancy: governing board.

Impact

The legislative changes proposed by AB559 will necessitate an evolution in the appointment process for board members. For the newly included youth and tribal representatives, appointments will be based on lists provided by relevant organizations, which signifies an effort to incorporate diverse perspectives. Importantly, this bill transitions the governing board's meetings from the Ralph M. Brown Act to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, enhancing transparency and oversight of board operations.

Summary

AB559, introduced by Assemblymember Arambula, aims to amend the governance structure of the San Joaquin River Conservancy. This bill expands the board from 15 to 16 members, introducing a representative from a California Native American tribe and a youth member aged 18-26, both appointed by the Governor. The initiative emphasizes inclusivity within the board, which oversees the management of public lands in the San Joaquin River Parkway, reflecting broader stakeholder engagement, particularly from marginalized groups such as Native American tribes and youth organizations.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB559 appears to be generally positive amongst supporters who view the addition of both Native American and youth voices as a significant move towards social justice and environmental stewardship. Opponents, however, may express concerns about potential bureaucratic complexities or the adequacy of representation from these new members, questioning whether the increase in diversity will translate into effective governance.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around questions of representation and the efficiency of governance. While the bill is designed to foster a more diverse governing board, it raises questions about the practical implications of these changes, such as the qualifications of new appointees and whether they can equitably represent their communities' interests. Furthermore, the requirement that appointments include sponsorship from nonprofit organizations may introduce challenges related to the logistics and administrative burden placed on local governance bodies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB583

Salton Sea Conservancy.

CA AB721

Huron Hawk Conservancy.

CA AB3119

San Diego International Airport Mobility and Sustainability Committee: airport mobility and sustainability plan.

CA SB774

Research program: firefighting: wildland and wildland-urban interface.

CA AB805

County of San Diego: transportation agencies.

CA SB817

Fire protection: Office of the State Fire Marshal: State Board of Fire Services: membership.

CA SB1215

Fire protection: Office of the State Fire Marshal: State Board of Fire Services: membership: quorum.