California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB612

Introduced
2/12/21  
Introduced
2/12/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Report Pass
3/23/21  
Report Pass
3/23/21  
Refer
3/24/21  
Refer
3/24/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Worker classification: business-to-business voluntary deposit arrangements.

Impact

AB 612 is expected to have significant implications for those who engage in business-to-business agreements that involve deposits of tangible personal property. By allowing such arrangements to bypass the ABC test, it could alter how businesses hire and retain workers. The impact of this bill on state laws centers on the delineation between employees and independent contractors, which could result in changes to labor rights, benefits, and protections previously afforded to workers classified under the ABC test. The exemptions provided in the bill might incentivize more businesses to enter into these types of arrangements, thereby influencing the overall labor market in the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 612, introduced by Assembly Member Mayes, relates to worker classification and amends the California Labor Code by introducing a new exemption from the commonly applied ABC test. This test is utilized to determine whether workers qualify as employees or independent contractors. AB 612 specifically targets bona fide business-to-business arrangements that involve voluntary deposits, allowing these relationships to be classified under a different set of criteria based on established case law from Borello. The legislation aims to clarify and potentially ease the classification of workers in certain contracting relationships, hoping to foster more flexibility in business operations within California.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 612 is mixed, with proponents arguing that it facilitates operational efficiencies for businesses that often deal with independent contractors in a competitive environment. They posit that the bill could lead to increased economic activity and job creation by not heavily burdening businesses with stringent classification standards. Conversely, opponents express concern that the bill could undermine worker protections and lead to exploitation in the employment relationship by minimizing the safeguards traditionally upheld by the ABC test, potentially leaving workers vulnerable to misclassification.

Contention

The primary contention regarding AB 612 revolves around its potential to weaken existing labor standards and protections. Critics argue that allowing exemptions from the ABC test could lead to a rise in misclassification disputes, where workers lose out on benefits and rights consistent with employee status. Additionally, some stakeholders worry about the impact on the state’s overall labor regulations, as they fear this bill may set a precedent for further deregulation in worker classifications in California. The debate encapsulates broader discussions about maintaining balance between fostering a favorable business climate while ensuring comprehensive protections for all workers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB451

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: licensed manicurists.

CA AB1928

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors.

CA AB39

Digital financial asset businesses: regulatory oversight.

CA AB1934

Digital financial asset businesses.

CA AB224

Worker status: employees and independent contractors: newspaper distributors and carriers.

CA AB747

Business: unlawful employee contracts and requirements.

CA SB988

Freelance Worker Protection Act.

CA AB3108

Business: mortgage fraud.

CA AB2185

Employment agencies: domestic workers.

CA SB1503

Cannabis: workers and license requirements.

Similar Bills

CA AB3066

Mobilehome Residency Law Protection Act.

MI HB6214

State finance: other; office of the Michigan bullion depository and Michcoin act; create. Creates new act.

MI HB4086

State finance: other; office of the Michigan bullion depository and Michcoin act; create. Creates new act.

MO SB97

Modifies various provisions relating to banks and trust companies

LA SB100

Provides liability protection for federally insured depository institutions and mutual associations that transfer money or property by relying on small succession affidavits. (gov sig)

MO HB754

Modifies standards for certain financial organizations

MO SB835

Modifies provisions relating to financial transactions

KS HB2152

Substitute for HB 2152 by Committee on Financial Institutions and Pensions - Mandating financial institutions to secure governmental unit deposits in excess of the amount insured or guaranteed by the FDIC by utilizing a public moneys pooled method of securities, prohibiting investment advisers that execute bids for the investment of public moneys from managing moneys directly from such bid, allowing governmental unit deposits to be invested at a rate agreed upon by the governmental unit and the financial institution, requiring certification from a governmental unit that deposits in the municipal investment pool fund were first offered to a financial institution in the preceding year and allowing financial institutions to file complaints upon the failure to comply.