California Assembly Bill AB647

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/12/21
• Refer: 3/18/21
• Report Pass: 3/22/21
• Refer: 3/23/21
• Failed: 2/1/22

Caption

Career Preparedness Systems Framework pilot program: appropriation.

Impact

If enacted, AB 647 would direct the State Department of Education to allocate funds to a selected school district through a competitive selection process. The pilot program is expected to serve as a diagnostic template, benefiting local educational agencies by identifying and addressing gaps in student preparedness for careers. The selected district will be responsible for producing a report detailing the framework’s development and its integration into local control and accountability plans, thereby influencing educational strategies across the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 647, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva, focuses on enhancing the career preparedness of students in California by establishing a Career Preparedness Systems Framework pilot program. The bill proposes an appropriation of $1,000,000 from the General Fund for the 2021-2022 fiscal year to facilitate the implementation of this program in local educational agencies. The framework aims to help schools cultivate essential skills in students, including soft skills, hard skills, and a sense of purpose and authentic voice, which are crucial for their future employment and professional success.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 647 is largely positive among proponents who view it as a proactive measure to better equip students for the workforce. Stakeholders such as educators and community groups are supportive of the bill's objectives, emphasizing its potential to create a more aligned educational experience. However, as with any legislative initiative that involves appropriations and changing structures, there could be concerns about the effective implementation of the framework and the equitable distribution of resources among districts.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the allocation of resources and the competitive selection process for districts to secure funding. Some critics might argue that such competitive funding could disadvantage smaller or underfunded districts, raising concerns about equity. Additionally, there may be discussions about the specific metrics and guidelines that will govern the operation of the pilot program and how success will be measured, which could lead to debates about educational standards and local control.