California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB652

Introduced
2/12/21  
Introduced
2/12/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Report Pass
3/29/21  
Report Pass
3/29/21  
Refer
3/30/21  
Refer
3/30/21  
Report Pass
4/7/21  
Engrossed
5/20/21  
Engrossed
5/20/21  
Refer
5/20/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Report Pass
6/23/21  
Report Pass
6/23/21  
Refer
6/23/21  
Report Pass
7/12/21  
Enrolled
9/2/21  
Enrolled
9/2/21  
Chaptered
10/5/21  

Caption

Product safety: juvenile products: chemicals: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Impact

The enactment of AB 652 will align California's product safety standards with growing national and international concerns regarding the harmful effects of PFAS chemicals. By restricting the introduction of these substances in products used by children, the law aims to mitigate health risks associated with exposure to toxic chemicals. This change will likely necessitate adjustments in manufacturing processes across the state, as companies will need to seek alternative materials that comply with the new regulations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 652 aims to enhance product safety for juvenile products by prohibiting the sale or distribution of items containing regulated perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), effective from July 1, 2023. The bill defines 'juvenile products' broadly to cover a variety of items designed for children under 12 years of age, including cribs, highchairs, and infant carriers. Manufacturers are mandated to replace PFAS chemicals with the least toxic alternatives, indicating a significant shift toward safer materials in products intended for children.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding AB 652 appears to be positive, particularly among child safety advocates and environmental groups who support the initiative to limit harmful substances in products for young children. Proponents argue that the bill signifies a proactive approach to public health and safety. However, some industry representatives express concerns regarding potential disruptions in supply chains and increased costs associated with sourcing safer materials.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the challenge of compliance for manufacturers who may find it difficult to identify suitable replacements for PFAS. Critics of the regulations argue that the bill could lead to supply shortages or increased product prices, which may disproportionately affect low-income families. Additionally, defining the specific alternatives that are deemed 'least toxic' may create further uncertainty in the enforcement of the law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB347

Household product safety: toxic substances: testing and enforcement.

IA HF588

A bill for an act prohibiting the use, manufacture, distribution, and sale of consumer products containing certain chemicals and making penalties applicable.

MN SF796

Off-highway vehicles made for children and related items exemption from the definition of a juvenile product under Amara's Law

MN SF1298

Off-highway vehicles, snowmobiles, and electric-assisted bicycles from prohibition on PFAS in certain juvenile products

MN HF552

PFAS in juvenile products prohibited.

IL SB0088

EPA-PFAS CONSUMER PROTECTION

IL HB2516

PFAS PRODUCT BAN

MN SF2164

Commercial and industrial products exemption from certain PFAS restrictions provision and PFAS reporting requirements modifications provision