California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB683

Introduced
2/12/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Refer
3/22/21  
Refer
3/22/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Recycling: procurement.

Impact

The bill proposes a significant update to how state agencies handle recycled product procurement, aiming to ensure that they favor recycled options when equal in quality and price compared to non-recycled products. By permitting the addition of new products that meet specified criteria, AB683 aims to not only enhance recycling rates but also to potentially introduce new markets for recycled materials. This legislative move reflects California's continued commitment to solid waste reduction and environmental protection by promoting a circular economy.

Summary

AB683, introduced by Assembly Member Grayson, amends Sections 12209 and 12305 of the Public Contract Code, primarily focusing on solid waste recycling and procurement. The bill seeks to enhance the existing framework of the California Integrated Waste Management Act by allowing the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to identify additional recycled products for procurement. This enhances the requirements of the State Agency Buy Recycled Campaign (SABRC), which mandates the purchase of recycled products when feasible, underlining the importance of state agencies in promoting recycling efforts in California.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB683 seems to be supportive, particularly among environmental advocates and stakeholders focused on sustainability. Officials involved in recycling and waste management have expressed approval of the bill, viewing it as a necessary step toward more comprehensive recycling practices. However, there may be concerns about the implementation of these new standards and the ability of state agencies to adapt to increased requirements without excess bureaucracy or added costs.

Contention

There are potential points of contention surrounding AB683 that relate to its implementation and the logistics involved in adapting to new procurement standards. Critics may argue about the administrative burden it places on state agencies and the necessity for infrastructure to manage the increased variety of recycled products. The discussion may also highlight challenges regarding the availability and pricing of recycled products in comparison to traditional options. Overall, while the intent behind the bill is environmentally focused, practical considerations regarding cost and implementation are likely to be debated.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB661

Recycling: materials.

CA SB633

Beverage containers: recycling.

CA AB478

Solid waste: thermoform plastic containers: postconsumer thermoform recycled plastic: commingled rates.

CA AB1158

Carpet recycling.

CA AB2784

Solid waste: thermoform plastic containers: postconsumer thermoform recycled plastic.

CA AB793

Recycling: plastic beverage containers: minimum recycled content.

CA AB973

Recycling: plastic trash bags: plastic packaging and products.

CA SB38

Beverage containers.